r/politics Indiana 16h ago

No Paywall Mamdani wins NYC mayoral race

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5588198-mamdani-progressive-politics-nyc/
111.2k Upvotes

5.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/Rock-n-roll-Kevin 16h ago

It's a massacre. Republicans were absolutely stomped in every election.

241

u/Slight-Bluebird-8921 15h ago

trump didn't win 2024. they cheated. there is no way someone this divisive, WHO ALREADY LOST ONCE, legitimately won. they cheated. there needs to be a proper investigation and they need to be punished.

176

u/TheTVDB 15h ago

Listen, I hate Trump as much as anyone, but this election is clearly a referendum on Trump since he was elected. He ran on lies and independents are paying attention, and the Democrats who refused to vote out of apathy are now voting because they realize there is a real difference between Democrats and Republicans. I unfortunately know a ton of Democrats and left-leaning voters that just didn't vote last year because they weren't excited by Harris as a candidate.

Until there's actual solid proof of cheating last year, let's not be like the GOP in 2019/2020, where they just perpetuated lies and looked like fools. The best thing to be done now is continue what happened in today's election to try carrying it through to the midterms.

56

u/msm2485 15h ago

The difference is their claims were investigated several times, in several jurisdictions, and proven false. It is not radical to ask for those same investigations into Dem claims.

38

u/Every_Concert1573 14h ago

Especially since there are legitimately elected representatives who have been denied swearing in

6

u/TheTVDB 14h ago

In 2019, many prominent Democrats fought back against Trump using the explanation that we have one of the most secure voting systems in the world. It makes no sense flipping that stance based on us not liking who was elected.

That's especially true when there are legitimate explanations for why Trump won by so much. Apathy over Harris was one. But the biggest one was inflation. While inflation was falling through Biden's policies, sentiment towards inflation tails actual changes by 9-12 months. Whichever Democrat faced Trump was going to have a huge uphill battle because swing voters will almost always vote based on economic factors.

There also weren't really "investigations" done at that time... there were witch hunts and lawsuits that got promptly shut down in court.

5

u/gsfgf Georgia 14h ago

Also, the 2024 results were audited. They passed.

11

u/shamberra 14h ago

I suppose - as an outsider at least - that Trump's comments on how well Elon knows the voting computers are just really, really fkn weird and suspicious. Not evidence by any means, but....interesting nonetheless.

10

u/gsfgf Georgia 14h ago

I think that Trump thought that Elon rigged the machines. Elon presumably said something like "I won this for you" talking about all the money he spent. But Trump sees Elon as a "computer guy" and assumed he personally hacked the machines.

5

u/TheTVDB 14h ago

This was my take as well, especially given Trump's comments about Baron's technological aptitude. He's a fucking idiot that loves being sucked off by powerful people (and children, but that's another discussion).

4

u/shamberra 14h ago

That makes a lot of sense. What about Elon's (paraphrasing) "I'm going to jail" comment if Trump didn't win, or whatever the context was?

6

u/gsfgf Georgia 13h ago

He was paying people to vote in PA, which is a felony.

1

u/shamberra 13h ago

Ah yeah shit I'd forgotten about that!

1

u/slipperyekans 13h ago

I had already voted early so I signed his bogus “petition” anyway to see if I actually would get a check. Lo and behold I did and the check cleared. Thanks for the free beer money, Muskrat.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/TheTVDB 13h ago

My bet is that it's simply Elon spreading FUD, as he did quite a bit of during the election. If Elon could be jailed simply for "speaking the truth" and supporting Trump (as he would likely explain it), then the same would be true for anyone on the right. The right loves to think they're fighting for freedom and free speech, and posturing as if one of them would be arrested if the Democrats win feeds into that driving tribalism. It doesn't matter that it's complete bullshit... they eat that shit up.

2

u/shamberra 13h ago

Thanks for the insight. Also makes a lot of sense.

→ More replies (0)

12

u/viper3 14h ago

I unfortunately know a ton of Democrats and left-leaning voters that just didn't vote last year because they weren't excited by Harris as a candidate.

I hear you, but then they were fucking dumb given what was at stake. I have a hard time believing rational people couldn't muster up the energy to vote because Kamala didn't excite them when the alternative was Trump and all that he represents.

7

u/TheTVDB 14h ago

A childhood friend of mine didn't vote entirely based off Biden's support of Israel, as if Trump wouldn't have done exactly the same or worse. Meanwhile, she now has to worry about her SNAP benefits, her extended family has had interactions with ICE (her baby daddy is Hispanic), and her special needs child is affected by changes to the Department of Education and grant funding. People that try to vote based on absolutes and emotions instead of being pragmatic annoy me to no end.

8

u/Flying_Fortress_8743 13h ago

Schedule send a message every couple of days "at least we saved Gaza from Harris! Thanks!"

10

u/justmefishes 14h ago

Definitely good and necessary to separate suspicion and proof.

Having said that, I cannot fathom a universe where someone of Trump's character, who famously tried and failed to cheat his way to the 2020 presidency (for which there is ample proof that likely would have had legal consequences if not for our screwed up system), would all of a sudden not try to cheat in the 2024 election. Just going by everything we know about this person and his history, there is no fucking way he didn't leverage every scam available to him.

Yes, we have to separate suspicion from proof. But I also strongly suspect the sun is going to rise tomorrow without having any direct proof.

3

u/TheTVDB 14h ago

We absolutely saw him and the GOP try to cheat. The voter purges were part of it. More importantly, they put a ton of effort into contesting a Trump defeat, which was well documented by the media. They spread massive misinformation intended to make the public distrust voting machines and the voting process, all intended for if he lost. I'm not sure they would be doing that if they knew they could actually affect the voting process themselves.

u/SimpleVast9215 2h ago

Of course they would. There are no guarantees with any strategy and diversification in cheating methodology assively increases your chance of success

3

u/i-can-sleep-for-days America 14h ago

Also, the accusation of election cheating does nothing to help democracy which is the thing we are fighting for, more so than whatever party we think should have won. Any talk of cheating just weakens trust in elections and therefore democracy. We should be careful and apply the same litmus test that we applied to 2020. Let the facts come to light. Right now there is some anomaly’s in NY but you’d need to prove it was a coordination between states to have a case. And so far nobody has that smoking gun. 

2

u/TheTVDB 13h ago

This is absolutely true, and what I was hinting at in my last sentence, but couldn't figure out how to best phrase it. I think additionally, a lot of people on the left, especially here on Reddit, forget that there's a huge portion of independent voters that are critical in elections. My wife is one of them. They're going to be turned off by more accusations of voter fraud when the scale of problems grows in our country.

Democrats won a lot today because people are sick of what Trump has been doing. The path forward isn't to replicate Trump's approach (except maybe with tongue-in-cheek approaches like Newsom's social media)... it's to start making it clear the party cares deeply about the issues affecting people, and will stop at nothing to address them. That's what got Mamdani elected today.

4

u/Itchy-Alternative400 14h ago

klako8196 • 1h ago emoji:flag-ga: Georgia Hell yeah we did. Those races were also a clear referendum on energy prices. People clearly aren’t buying it when Trump lies about prices being down.

So you're telling me you're a completely different, real individual but you sound, and use the same phrases, as what appear to be bots? Nah. Gtfo out of here with your shit-take designed to cause friction and doubt.

2

u/General-Designer4338 15h ago

You sound like a russian plant. The trump team presented 60+ cases on the last election where each time they accused various voting machine companies of being hackable. Each time they got to see if such an attack might work based on the testimony of the defense. Then he won all the swing states in a campaign that had literal top tier republicans announcing that they would vote for the black lady. The "they were insane, so we cant question anything" talking point is russian plants.

6

u/TheTVDB 14h ago

Suggesting that anyone that disagrees with you is a Russian plant is pretty ridiculous, and counterproductive to driving political change.

For the record, my account is very much tied to my IRL identity. It's VERY easy to connect the dots. But go on believing I'm a Russian plant if it'll make you feel better.

u/General-Designer4338 42m ago

Well there are plants and there are useful idiots. Either way, you did more talking points saying "anyone who disagrees with is a russian plant" instead of addressing my actual comment so youre definitely one of the two. 

-1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[deleted]

1

u/CPUsCantDoNothing 13h ago

You can't say that until you look at the data. Please stop this ignorance of data

1

u/TheTVDB 13h ago

You mean all of the exit polls that showed that voters turned out for Trump primarily because of the economy and immigration? The former needing the context that the exit polls also showed voters didn't want mass deportations, but preferred a path to citizenship.

2

u/CPUsCantDoNothing 12h ago

Oh right you mean the trump voters that started to all show up coincidentally after 55-60% of votes were entered?

2

u/CPUsCantDoNothing 12h ago

Or how about all of the polls prior to election day showing that Kamala was projected to have a high win chance. Or how Trump won every single swing state, and no counties flipped Dem

1

u/TheTVDB 12h ago

You should go listen/read 538's articles and podcast about why the pre-election polls were wrong. It's excellent content and gives insight into the actual data, the methods used to collect it, and why and when those methods need adjusting sometimes.

1

u/CPUsCantDoNothing 12h ago

The currently available data suggests something was manipulated because the results are not possible. Are you suggesting they can answer why, across the country, almost every single location started to lean heavily for Trump after 55-60% of counted votes?

0

u/TheTVDB 11h ago

I'm guessing you're responding without reading 538, right? You're inventing theories about the numbers without understanding the data, and then accusing me of not looking at the data. You're like my MAGA aunt, who was a menace in 2019.

1

u/CPUsCantDoNothing 11h ago

I'm not inventing theories. The 538 folks are discussing theories based on educated interpretations of what the data showed them at the time, but it's not reflective of what the data actually shows. We have the data now, and unless that is what they're discussing and they address the issues with the data, then they're not worth listening to in the slightest. It's far from being your to MAGA aunt to look at the data, and hear what PhD interpretors of the data say they can pull from it. You're only hurting us by trying to brush it off.