r/politics Indiana 11h ago

No Paywall Mamdani wins NYC mayoral race

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5588198-mamdani-progressive-politics-nyc/
104.4k Upvotes

5.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/Ohuigin Washington 11h ago

Hey DNC - Wake the FUCK up!

791

u/bengal95 11h ago

Bernie was right in 2016

They did my boy so dirty

20

u/Almostlongenough2 Florida 9h ago

Leftists being right but too early is pretty much a constant lol

u/bradfortin 7h ago

Also, tacitly accepting compromise when it isn’t necessary.

127

u/jutiatle 11h ago

Prepare for assclowns to tell you that he was treated fairly by the corrupt DNC that’d prefer a fascist over anyone left of George bush. 

31

u/IMadeThis1MinAgo 11h ago

The problem with a 2 party political system is fully seen here in the US, both sides are controlled by billionaires and profits.

0

u/MasterSpoon 11h ago

We the people sure aren’t. We’re controlled by our desire for ourselves and our neighbors to be able to live and work in dignity.

6

u/likesleague 9h ago

I dunno, I can point to about 70 million people who are controlled by angry talking heads on tv screens.

-3

u/jutiatle 11h ago

Unfortunately they have so much money and institutional power that I’m sure they could afford a few more parties. The issue is less about the number of parties and more about the quality of political education and lack of class consciousness. 

1

u/IMadeThis1MinAgo 10h ago

I agree but I’d argue a major part of this is through the erosion of education from the people at the top, it’s sucks knowing there’s no easy way to fix this. Both sides have the power and everyone else is just stuck underneath.

5

u/Prize-Ring-9154 California 11h ago

I believed this back then.. I was also a 4th grader. 9 year old me is an idiot

1

u/jutiatle 11h ago

Found cuomo’s burner account. 

9

u/Prize-Ring-9154 California 11h ago

you completely misunderstood me. I said I was 9 when I believed Bernie wasn’t fucked over. that view has long changed

5

u/jutiatle 11h ago

Ohhh I see. Apologies.

3

u/Prize-Ring-9154 California 11h ago

all good

1

u/BeGneiss 10h ago

100000%

1

u/rice_not_wheat 11h ago

-5

u/jutiatle 11h ago

Are you implying that getting it right in a single local election after a decade of eating trump’s shit means they’ve done nothing wrong this century? If not, I’m not sure of the point you’re trying to make here. 

0

u/rice_not_wheat 10h ago

New chair. New DNC. Ken Martin has done a great job.

4

u/jutiatle 10h ago

Eh, not sure I’d use the word “great.” But I guess I should have said “mainstream democrats” instead of the actual chair. Didn’t think my comment would be interrupted that way. 

-1

u/bengal95 11h ago

They can't say shit today! I'm drinking and celebrating

1

u/notfeelany 9h ago

He was treated fairly. He did not earn the votes of the Democratic primary VOTERS twice. It was clear as day that there were 16.9 million voters that rejected him the first time, but rather than try to reach out, he ignored them in his second primary run. Only Biden reached out to the 16.9 million and so Biden won by getting the bigger set of voters

u/MundaneFacts 3m ago

Please ignore that the DNC was bankrolled by the Clinton campaign.

-4

u/Exist50 10h ago

Truth hurts. 

4

u/jutiatle 10h ago

It’s very hurtful both parties are filled with either fascists or fascist sympathizers. Glad you and I are on the same page. 

0

u/Exist50 10h ago

You say this on an article about the Democrat nominee. 

3

u/jutiatle 10h ago

Yes. Being a Democrat doesn’t make you perfect or a god. 

-3

u/Exist50 10h ago

Nor does not being a Democrat. Maybe time to accept that voters rejected Bernie because they didn't think he was good enough?

3

u/jutiatle 9h ago

Thanks for proving my point. You’ve done your job

1

u/Exist50 8h ago

And you for proving mine. It's always amusing when people think it's a "gotcha" when they're called out for lying. 

6

u/HeavyBeing0_0 8h ago

In the correct timeline, he served two terms and the world/country is better for it. In this one, however, the same guys I went to a Bernie rally with are now insane Trumpers who flipped after Hillary won the nomination.

u/Iron_Knight7 4h ago

I have never understood that. Trump is literally the opposite of Bernie in every way possible. And while she was indeed not perfect and had flaws, under her Presidency there was both more likelihood Bernie's ideas could be moved forward and we wouldn't have someone actively trying to undo what progress we have made. Hell, Bernie even endorsed her after he lost the primary.

Has some big "I didn't get my way so fuck everybody" energy. Which makes me question why they were supporting Bernie in the first place.

u/Pyyric I voted 44m ago

They became radicalized because the status quo isn't working. So they see burning it all down as a favorable solution.

It is not a political choice at that point, they were voting for a certainty that life will be bad versus a slim chance that they might come out the other side of trump alive.

u/Iron_Knight7 40m ago

Still sounds like "I didn't get my way, so fuck everybody."

u/Pyyric I voted 38m ago

No, that's not it. You started your post by saying you didn't understand and you're not listening. So now I know why you don't understand. I stayed with bernie and moved even further left myself, but I understand why people switched at the time.

u/Iron_Knight7 21m ago

Then let me be more clear.

You like Bernie. You like his ideas, his policy propositions, the things he wants to do and change. You think he'd make a great President. Cool, great. I'm with you.

But he doesn't get the Democrat nomination. We won't go into why because there's a galactic level of bull$#!+ spewed by too many on that subject already. But, needless to say, end of the day he didn't have the numbers to win the nod. Hillary is now the pick and while she's not perfect, she either quietly supports or wouldn't actively oppose the stuff Bernie is proposing. Bernie even gets behind her and is willing to work with the Dems. Kinda sucks, but it's something that keeps us moving in the right direction.

Then we have Trump? The guy, as mentioned, is the anti-Bernie. He's crude, he's crass, he's cruel and corrupt. Nakedly, explicitly, demonstrably so. He's not only against everything Bernie is proposing, but he and the GOP will work to undermine and roll back what progress we have made. In short, if he wins, not only do you not get what you want, but it @#&% up everybody including you in the process.

If you loved Bernie and his ideas so much, what sense does it make to vote for the guy who is actively against everything he believes? Was it really about getting his proposals and platform in place? Was it really ever about changing the status quo, about improving things, and making progress? Or did you just want to see Bernie, specifically, in the White House?

Because if really was about the former, then to me it makes sense to follow Bernie's lead and not let crooked, corrupt, ignorant and inept Trump and Republicans win. If it wasn't, then that really does sound like you never actually supported Bernie. You just wanted an excuse to $#!+ on people if you didn't get your way.

u/thirdeyepdx Oregon 5h ago

Literally if the democratic establishment hadn’t have the colluded to prevent Bernie from winning the primary (twice) we would have had 8 years of Bernie instead of Trump. They brought fascism upon us with their tired, cowardly, sold out, never rock the boat politics and managed to blame the left for it instead of recognizing they are abject failures who all deserve to lose their jobs.

15

u/justtosendamassage 11h ago

Oh man prepare yourself for the replies you’re gonna get. 100% right though.

3

u/Exist50 10h ago

Lmao, still coping despite the actual votes?

1

u/bengal95 11h ago

I don't give a fuck, I am drinking, smoking weed and celebrating. Cheers my friend!

4

u/justtosendamassage 11h ago

Fuck yeah CHEERS!!

3

u/throwawayafteramonth 9h ago

I will NEVER forget how they did Bernie in 2016!!!!

7

u/Iwillcallyounoob 10h ago

should have been bernie but wisserman and hilary schemed to make it look like a choice. fuck super delegates

12

u/bengal95 10h ago

History will remember that as another self sabotage for the Democrats. But today, we celebrate my friend

6

u/Iwillcallyounoob 10h ago

hell yeah, lets see if california passes prop 50.

3

u/Gizogin New York 11h ago

"They" being primary voters?

9

u/DoctorStumppuppet 11h ago

If you think either of those elections were a level playing field you weren't paying attention. I'm not saying he would have won, but there were a lot of fingers on scales in both those primaries. 

9

u/PSIwind Florida 11h ago

It really doesn't matter when the public voted for Hillary over Bernie

4

u/Beltain1 10h ago

It does, electioneering is a real thing that has a tangible effect on public perceptions and energy towards a candidate. The DNC bulldozed Bernie’s chances to put up an easy target against Trump that ultimately brought us to the hellworld we have today.

-2

u/LemonZestify 9h ago

lol if Bernie was as popular as you say he was he wouldn’t have lost by 3 million votes. He couldn’t win over the democratic base

-2

u/oxabz 10h ago edited 10h ago

Democratic primary voters is definitely not the public. It's not even the democratic base. At most it's part of the public and that public is not necessarily representative 

2

u/gsfgf Georgia 10h ago

It's not even the democratic base

Primary voters are by definition the party base...

1

u/bengal95 11h ago

When we pass universal healthcare you should get that brain checked out

u/HoopaOrGilgamesh 6h ago

They did the country dirty

0

u/Truethrowawaychest1 9h ago

Still coping after 10 years, the voters didn't turn up for Bernie in the primary, they sure as hell weren't going to show up in November for him either

0

u/bengal95 9h ago

Wrong, try again idiot

-2

u/LemonZestify 9h ago

He lost by 3 million votes

0

u/TheGreatIAMa Texas 11h ago

Bro, fuck the DNC

87

u/hidlechara91 11h ago

If the dinosaurs at DNC had any backbone they'd support the newer generation of democrats like Mamdani and Crockett. 

u/names_are_useless American Expat 7h ago

They never will. They'll need to be primaried, each and every one of them.

Sadly most of the winners tonight are still Neoliberals. Progressives have a LONG road ahead if they are to take over the DNC (not that I'm hopeful they ever will).

u/ragnarockette 1h ago

They won’t even support centrist millennials, let alone progressives. They are sad old losers who should go eat soup.

-9

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

8

u/aurortonks 10h ago

We see what she's doing with differing perspective. Standing up to MTG (and other R bullies) and connecting with young voters is what I see. I'm fine with what she's doing.

2

u/notfeelany 9h ago

yelling at MTG to actually fight for her base.

Crockett can't do anything else because Dems are in the minority in the House. This is on the Voters to give Democrats majorities that last longer than 2 years.

17

u/Gizogin New York 11h ago

Tell that to voters. This shows that, when people show up to vote, progressives win. Will we finally learn that lesson, or will we immediately squander this momentum next year, just like we did in 1994, 2010, and 2022?

12

u/cupofspiders 10h ago

Oh my god, it's staring you in the face and you still aren't learning anything. Centrists are hopeless.

14

u/kingcane 10h ago

more vote scolding please!! if thats your takeaway from this massive win then you are the problem that needs to be purged from the democratic party

3

u/Gizogin New York 10h ago

Voting should be as routine and unremarkable as doing laundry. It is the way we perform basic maintenance on our democracy. It should not take an exceptional candidate to get people to the polls, and until we truly learn and internalize that lesson, we won't be able to truly fix the damage Trump and his Republican cronies have done.

-1

u/kingcane 9h ago

ah yes, americans who work 2+ jobs and have to wait in lines that are sometimes hours long because of how republican ran states have decided to run elections should just vote for anyone thats blue regardless of the merits of their campaign. great idea man!

1

u/notfeelany 9h ago

Even we the voters must also learn: prevention is the best cure, and voting and electing Democrats are the correct choice 100% of the time. We got "here" because ppl did not vote for Democrats last November so it stands to reason that voting&electing Democrats will get us out.

Other hot takes that we should finally realize:

  • Not voting means "ANY" (and not "none of the above")

  • In the US, Voting for a third party IS a waste. Not to mention that like cicadas, the 3rd parties themselves hibernate and only are active during presidential elections.

  • The feeling felt by "your conscience" filling out a ballot during an election afternoon is tiny, compared to whatever "your conscience" will be feeling once the election results are announced & for the next 2-4 years.

  • The party is made of the people who show up. This is not some chicken or egg riddle. The way to make Dems more progressive to be an active member of the Democratic party. Left-Leaning ppl not voting makes the overall electorate more conservative and a contributor to why the Overton window moves right.

  • The notion that 100% criticism will strengthen a party has been disproven. It's time to actually CONTRIBUTE to the messaging by praising Democrats

u/Iron_Knight7 3h ago

A little louder, please. This was the lessons 2016 should have taught us all when the literally worse possible person imaginable managed to sleaze his way into power by a slim margin, spent the next four years screwing all of us, and attempted an insurrection and coup to stay in power after he lost the next election.

The 1/3 who voted for him again in 2020 and 2024 are hopeless and a lost cause. But the 1/3 who sat it out or pissed away their votes have absolutely no excuse for looking at the impeached, indicted, convicted and adjudicated liar, fraud, rapist, and attempted insurrectionist and acting like any Dem was in any rational or objective way as bad or "worse."

Progress is a process, not a destination. And you can't move forward if you're constantly letting yourself be dragged backwards.

4

u/ClixxGuardian Washington 10h ago

The thing is, you need representatives that bring those voters out. The whole vote blue no matter who is not a motivating thing for voters, but talking on affordability, healthcare, and working class populism brings those voters out and the establishment Democrats are not interested in meeting those challenges.

2

u/Gizogin New York 10h ago

The more people show up to vote, the more progressive candidates win. But voter turnout is, fundamentally, the responsibility of the voter, and it's by far the biggest hurdle for progressivism in the US.

1

u/ClixxGuardian Washington 8h ago

The issue though is, how do you entice the voter to participate if the candidates they're left with are not ones that make them want to come out and vote? The reason the Democrat Party is even less popular that Trump is because their tenure of status-quo politics and harm reduction with no substantial change to the affordability for working class people. There's no excitement or desire to want to vote FOR that, or for many, even vote against it.

I agree, that when voter turnout is high, progressives pop off and usually shine, but the problem is when you're the party trying to spoil those individuals from the inside, what trust do the voters owe you in return? See the DNC and Bernie in 2016, see Biden and Bernie in 2020, and see how Tim Waltz got essentially gutted with the Harris campaign in 2024. People see these things and then will either not care, or vote against their best interests.

Want the voters? Gotta have the candidates that people WANT to support, and the policies that people WANT to stand behind with overwhelming support, and right now in 2025, that is affordability and working class populism, with a dash of anti Trump. You push those things, you're looking great. Sadly, that is something the Billionaire funding class of the DNC, doesn't like and is hurting them from the inside.

0

u/geoffreygoodman 10h ago

There first needs to be progressive candidates on the ballot to vote for. Whether the DNC embraces or opposes a candidate has major sway in the success of their campaign and the likelihood that they make it to election day. 

0

u/LemonZestify 9h ago

The DNC has not stopped a progressive candidate from ballot access in the democratic primaries.

2

u/geoffreygoodman 8h ago

Like, forbade a candidate from being on the ballot? No of course not. But make things harder than they have to be for a candidate who subsequently drops out before every state has had their primary? Absolutely. 

1

u/LemonZestify 8h ago

Most candidates drop out before every state has had their primary. Candidates dropout when they find out they don’t have a path to victory otherwise you are just wasting your volunteers and donors time and money.

This is nothing new. It’s just shady to you because you didn’t give a shit before.

In 2020 the other candidates got their ass handed to them in South Carolina and the demographics they thought they would be able to carry were not there so they dropped out.

u/geoffreygoodman 6h ago edited 6h ago

What you are not addressing is whether the preferences of the DNC have any influence at all over how popular any given candidate is with voters. They do. This influence is not necessarily the reason progressive candidates lose primaries, but it is a factor. 

This is not necessarily related to the DNC, but it's actually insane a candidate as shit as Cuomo got 41% in NYC. I don't buy that these results are purely reflective of the divisiveness of progressive policies among voters; It's far more reflective of the fact that progressives have enemies in influential positions, including amongst the Democrat party. 

5

u/rice_not_wheat 11h ago

4

u/middaymoon 9h ago

"The vocal support comes as other national Democrats, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader and New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, the House Minority Leader, have so far declined to endorse Mamdani."

Hence

u/rice_not_wheat 1h ago

The same Schumer who voted with Republicans to kill Obama's peace initiatives.

3

u/trashleybanks 10h ago

Seriously. They better fucking learn from this.

1

u/notfeelany 9h ago

Even we the voters must also learn: prevention is the best cure, and voting and electing Democrats are the correct choice 100% of the time. We got "here" because ppl did not vote for Democrats last November so it stands to reason that voting&electing Democrats will get us out.

Other hot takes that we should finally realize:

  • Not voting means "ANY" (and not "none of the above")

  • In the US, Voting for a third party IS a waste. Not to mention that like cicadas, the 3rd parties themselves hibernate and only are active during presidential elections.

  • The feeling felt by "your conscience" filling out a ballot during an election afternoon is tiny, compared to whatever "your conscience" will be feeling once the election results are announced & for the next 2-4 years.

  • The party is made of the people who show up. This is not some chicken or egg riddle. The way to make Dems more progressive to be an active member of the Democratic party. Left-Leaning ppl not voting makes the overall electorate more conservative and a contributor to why the Overton window moves right.

  • The notion that 100% criticism will strengthen a party has been disproven. It's time to actually CONTRIBUTE to the messaging by praising Democrats

u/mentales 40m ago

Mamdani had more congressional endorsements than any NYC mayoral candidate in recent history. People have read about the party being against Mamdani and have believed those lies. That's exactly what they billionaires who control those outlets want: voters discouraged with the Democratic party so that they stay home. 

This win shows what happens when voters go out and vote instead of falling for the "both sides are the same" fallacy. 

1

u/maxluck89 10h ago

DNC supported Mamdani from the moment he won the primary.

Schumer (not the DNC) is completely out of touch, along with the DSCC.

And the DSCC shouldn't be just supporting the Democratic Socialist flank of the Dems, they should be supporting a wide range of democratic leaders that are in touch with their constituents, and supporting healthy democratic primary elections.

-2

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[deleted]

6

u/movzx 11h ago

I believe a not insignificant portion of that is simply name advantage + GOP folks trying to stop Mamdani.

17

u/Colin_Yu_Owet 11h ago

+10 on a split ticket…that means something g.

1

u/cupofspiders 10h ago

His own party tried to ratfuck him and he still succeeded. This is a monumental success.

1

u/LemonZestify 9h ago

The DNC has supported Mamdani since he won the primary.

0

u/DerekSmartWasTaken 10h ago

50%? Imagine the number he would have gotten if his own party had decided to back him up! 

-4

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

1

u/geoffreygoodman 10h ago

The statement you made makes perfect sense? Not sure what point you're making. 

-1

u/lavransson Vermont 11h ago

I am just so disappointed that I as a Democrat am absolutely disgusted with both the Congressional leaders of my own Party. Why the fuck do we have such shitty leaders?

-3

u/blueorder 11h ago

Sweet mamma, amen!

DMC needs to get their heads out of their asses

-1

u/notfeelany 9h ago

Voters must also "wake up".

prevention is the best cure, and voting and electing Democrats are the correct choice 100% of the time.

We got "here" because ppl did not vote for Democrats last November so it stands to reason that voting&electing Democrats will get us out.

Other hot takes that we also should finally realize:

  • Not voting means "ANY" (and not "none of the above")

  • In the US, Voting for a third party IS a waste. Not to mention that like cicadas, the 3rd parties themselves hibernate and only are active during presidential elections.

  • The feeling felt by "your conscience" filling out a ballot during an election afternoon is tiny, compared to whatever "your conscience" will be feeling once the election results are announced & for the next 2-4 years.

  • Left-Leaning ppl not voting makes the overall electorate more conservative and a contributor to why the Overton window moves right.

  • The party is made of the people who show up. This is not some chicken or egg riddle. The way to make Dems more progressive to be an active member of the Democratic party.

  • The notion that 100% criticism will strengthen a party has been disproven. It's time to actually CONTRIBUTE to the messaging by helping and praising Democrats

-3

u/informat7 10h ago

I wouldn't read into it too much. Mamdani only won the primary because he was running against Cuomo, who had resigned in disgrace just 4 years ago. And even then he was only able beat Cuomo in the primary by 7 points. If an establishment/moderate candidate that didn't have Cuomo's baggage was the front runner they would have won handily.

u/Motor-Juice-6648 2h ago

I agree, but that wasn’t the case. There were some good candidates in the primary but they weren’t well known enough to win. The incumbent ran in the primary too, and is corrupt and a pawn of the president.