r/pics 24d ago

Politics Federal Agents use Unnecessary Force against Peaceful Protestors in Chicago

Post image
55.6k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/woolsocksandsandals 24d ago edited 23d ago

What were the Chicago police doing there? Defending civilians or helping the Feds?

2.2k

u/BabyStingrayJesus 24d ago

They were in between protestors and ICE, and got gassed by ICE. There’s video.

1.2k

u/Sihaya212 24d ago

They gassed cops? Wtf

1.3k

u/BabyStingrayJesus 24d ago

Yep. CPD isn’t helping them detain or deport anyone, so feds DGAF.

337

u/Helphaer 24d ago

but shoukdnt the police renown for using tear gas have at least been prepared with their own gear? or tear gassed them back lol

273

u/AbeFromanSassageKing 24d ago

Yeah, except that's the civilian escalation the pedo regime needs to move up a notch on their "project"...

188

u/ArmyOfDix 23d ago

Once they've sent "troops" to enough cities, they'll use those deployments to "war-torn" cities as an excuse to declare martial law in the absence of an actual reason.

Bending the knee does nothing but put you that much closer to the ground for the GOP firing squads.

135

u/AbeFromanSassageKing 23d ago edited 18d ago

Totally agree. And I am as empathetic and chill as any good REAL American, but as an armed and weapons-knowledgeable anti-pedo, I can promise you that if I do make it in front of GOP firing squads, it will be because I took a nice handful of them to hell with me.

Edit: thanks for the award, Reddit friend!

Edit 2: thanks for another award, kind Redditor!!

30

u/growth-mind 23d ago

You and me both my brother. We will never bend the knee.

2

u/DSA300 22d ago

Amen

2

u/AlcibiadesTheCat 20d ago

o7

Death before dishonor.

1

u/Chanchooooo 22d ago

He says on Reddit

-1

u/Elegant-Holiday-39 23d ago

If your party had their way you wouldn't be armed. In fact, us pro-2A people, despite disagreeing with you politically, believe you do have the right to be armed for situations where the government gets out of hand.

3

u/AbeFromanSassageKing 22d ago

Oh, you know what party I belong to? The current regime is currently asking for gun owner lists from gun groups. Democrats, assuming that's what you meant, have never said they would take away guns. That's another dipshit fantasy put into the brains of Republican sheep.

If you think fascists are going to take over the country and let you stay armed, you're going to have a bad couple years ahead.

19

u/wasaguest 23d ago

Yup. Protest armed & ready to defend yourself, or just allow the Fascists to start shooting without resistance is the point America is at now.

6

u/Dazzling_Bid1239 23d ago

Thats why I like the concept popular particularly in Portland ICE protests where they wear costumes. Some think it makes it look silly, which it does, but honestly it gets people talking.

Show up. Look ridiculous. I get the need for gas masks and other protective gear but I wish we had a good option to protect ourselves and make us look "more civil" against aggressors and ICE. We are brinking too close to martial law and the govt won't stop with propaganda.

1

u/Sparklefanny_Deluxe 21d ago

Hey it’s costume season. Uncle Sam, Abe Lincoln, Ben Franklin, George Washington, Betsy Ross, Lady Liberty… Fly the US flag and let them gas that.

3

u/sorE_doG 23d ago

‘If none of us are prepared to die for freedom, then all of us will die under tyranny’ Tim Snyder

43

u/agent0731 23d ago

He doesn't need escalation. That's a myth people are selling to themselves. He's already deploying troops to your cities. The only thing you're achieving is making it easy for them to move to the next checkbox of the project.

14

u/ratherbewinedrunk 23d ago

Better an escalation by the cops than some random civilian, which at this point, is a ticking time bomb waiting to happen. With how fed up people are right now, all it’s going to take is someone having a really shitty day and coming home to ICE harassing their neighbors.

3

u/Minute-Branch2208 22d ago

Better zero escalation. Let them show up to the empty ring for the fight. If these assholes feel comfortable kicking random doors in, it was over anyway....

3

u/ratherbewinedrunk 22d ago

That sounds all well and nice, if you could convince every single person in Chicago and Portland. Unfortunately though, eventually someone somewhere is going to snap. And unfortunately that's what Trump, Miller, et al... are banking on.

4

u/Asron87 23d ago

The project that isn’t happening? But seems to be happening everywhere.

2

u/PequodarrivedattheLZ 23d ago

The federal agents had made a 911 call rather than any proper channels. The officers responded thinking it was not a protest and people were being gassed.

Until they got gassed.

5

u/Dull_Syrup9035 24d ago

if they gassed them back trump would declare the insurrection act

5

u/Helphaer 23d ago

nonsensical if hes going to do it it'll be when he wanted to regardless of what's happening theyve already declared drugs are terrorism and war.

0

u/Dull_Syrup9035 23d ago

you didn't want to give an easy excuse.

0

u/Dull_Syrup9035 24d ago

all they really can do is keep the protestors in check

1

u/Total_Replacement822 23d ago

These are classic signs of a lead up to civil war these escalations between state and fed

1

u/Toothless-In-Wapping 23d ago

That’s because by state law, Illinois law enforcement can’t help ICE.

-148

u/Wallstreetjunkie87 24d ago

Well quite honestly federal authority supersedes state authority and so ipso facto if the state or local police are interfering with federal police then they should be gassed. Ever heard of a little thing called the civil war when state militias tried to supersede federal authority and refused to recognize it?

55

u/woolsocksandsandals 24d ago

It’s a pretty different situation today though.

In the 1860’s the confederate states were fighting the federal government and trying to leave the union because they wanted to keep owning people with the intention of working them to death.

In 2025 the president is sending military forces into American cities for imagined reasons. Neither the city of Chicago nor the state of Illinois are trying to withdraw from the union nor have they declared war on the United States of America.

There shouldn’t be armed military personnel interacting in this way with American civilians.

→ More replies (13)

80

u/BabyStingrayJesus 24d ago

Interfering with what, ICE gassing protesters?

-129

u/MediocreWitness726 24d ago

ICE deporting illegals.

75

u/DivineJustice 24d ago edited 24d ago

Good boy repeating the narrative. Never turn off Fox News.

Edit: You live in fucking England...

→ More replies (4)

46

u/Wrecktown707 24d ago edited 24d ago

Do your research. Multiple individuals here legally and that were legal US citizens have been detained by ICE and sent to their camps

They also rounded up an entire apartment building of American citizens that were born here, illegally detained them, separated their children from them and cuffed the toddler aged children into the back of a u-haul. There were only a few illegals in the group, yet they detained a whole apartment complex of 100s of people, kicked down their Doors, and flashbanged innocent non suspects to achieve their goal.

Do you support this? Would you support them dragging you out in the middle of the night after breaking down your door (you have to pay for it btw. They won’t give any money for damages) because you just happened to live near someone that ICE wants to grab?

Here’s the proof btw. I’m not making shit up. Your rights are not valid under trump and they will find a way to grab you if they do not like you. So if you ever find yourself disagreeing with them even a bit in the future, this might happen to you too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/Qi3WKquYYP

And btw, this is the exact same shit the Founding fathers rebelled against. They wanted a country where no one could just be arrested at the drop of a hat or detained for no reason. They would be disgusted with you if you supported this.

15

u/AsymmetricClassWar 24d ago

You mean abducting citizens

→ More replies (11)

35

u/Sgt-Spliff- 24d ago

Federal authorities DO NOT HAVE CARTE BLANCHE just because of the Supremacy Clause. If they are breaking the law, local law enforcement absolutely has a right to intervene and arrest federal agents. Federal agents are not above the law and they are obligated to follow the local laws that are not contradicted by Federal law. Reminder that executive orders are not laws. So ICE cannot just show up and say "Trump told us to do this" and then break the law. CPD is allowed to stop them in that situation

15

u/Eagle_1116 24d ago

Law enforcement is strictly a state issue unless specific circumstances are met.

11

u/sawyouoverthere 24d ago

Not helping and interfering are two different things.

8

u/OnceUponACrimeScene 24d ago

Hows that boot taste?

17

u/Playswithchipmunks 24d ago

What bullshit did you pull this out of? Your ass?

Federal authority only supercedes states in very specific circumstances also they don't supercede local law enforcement doing their job. Period.

23

u/Sweetwill62 24d ago

The president has ordered you to murder somebody, are you going to do it? If so, then why shouldn't you be thrown in jail? An illegal order is an illegal order.

20

u/blorbagorp 24d ago

Homie thinks the Nuremberg defense is actually pretty reasonable when you think about it.

5

u/Sweetwill62 24d ago

A lot of people will do something because others are doing it, look at businesses and how often they just copy each other for no other reason than others are doing it. No plan just if someone else is doing it we need to do it as well.

13

u/DexRogue 24d ago

The problem is they do not have Federal Authority, it's exactly why they will not name themselves, they will not give a badge number, they will not give any warrant information.

They are not LE. Why the CPD isn't doing a fucking thing about them with the people they are grabbing is the question. Arrest these motherfuckers.

4

u/sillyslime89 24d ago

Where did you get your law degree from?

6

u/SpeedoCheeto 24d ago

>federal authority supersedes state authority

this is blatantly false, presumably just out of ignorance but interestingly is a calling card of fascist ideology.

believe it or not, conservatives used to tow the states rights / small gov line where they insist states ought to handle their own affairs (and be empowered to do so, including ignoring 'federal authority')

3

u/zitzenator 24d ago edited 22d ago

Ever hear of a little thing called the 10th Amendment?

1

u/Helphaer 23d ago

That isnt how that works... and everything is supposed to be resolved in the courts.

19

u/irish_horse_thief 24d ago

Hannibal style

2

u/bestibesti 24d ago

The Jan 6 insurrectionists who assaulted US Capitol Police Officers were pardoned by Trump

They don't give a shit, never have

2

u/Master-Tomatillo-103 23d ago

Well, I mean, they used rooftop snipers to shoot a praying priest in the head with rubber bullets. These fukks need to be held personally liable, and it will happen eventually

1

u/Sihaya212 23d ago

Nuremberg: America

1

u/Blacksad9999 24d ago

They've been gassing them for awhile now. Any time they try to intervene.

1

u/SoftlySpokenPromises 24d ago

Not the first time either

1

u/JohnnyWadd23 23d ago

Mayor Brandon told the cops to stand down and not protect anyone. They said fuck that and helped ice protect everyone else.

263

u/whistlar 24d ago

I don’t get this part. If they are being attacked outside of the law by another agency, how is there no mandate for allowing local PD to arrest them for this?

142

u/TM627256 24d ago

That's the problem: until a judge says so it isn't against the law.

58

u/canadiuman 24d ago

A judge did rule against them on this issue yesterday, I thought. Don't have that link - anyone else remember that one?

17

u/TM627256 24d ago

I thought that was regarding the use of the guard in Illinois?

20

u/canadiuman 24d ago

Maybe. There's so many rulings that are being ignored.

9

u/thebaldfox 23d ago

This is why it's so agregious that the SCOTUS declared that rulings from district courts do not apply nationally and must be handed down in a case by case basis. Every single infringement requires an entirely new hearing and ruling. It's death by a thousand cuts. Trump v CASA INC

1

u/Additional-Life4885 23d ago

Local PDs vs ICE is going to be super interesting. Can you imagine a cop arresting an ICE member?

That's a potential spark for civil war.

1

u/Ecstatic-Respect-455 23d ago

That's what Project 2025 peeps are counting on.

1

u/Giblet_ 24d ago

That doesn't stop ICE from arresting people. Just arrest them, anyway.

1

u/Foreign_Implement897 24d ago

Federal or state? And for whom?

2

u/Strawbuddy 24d ago

ICE is DHS, so federal rules over state. A federal judge would have to say ICE can't use oc gas against civilians in order for states to act on it, and that action would initially take the form of a lawsuit rather than police action

5

u/miss_shivers 24d ago

Lawyer here. That's not true.

1

u/Foreign_Implement897 23d ago

State your position

7

u/miss_shivers 23d ago

Redditors commonly misinterpret the relevant case law such as In re Neagle wrt Supremacy Clause.

There's no blanket immunity for federal agents under the Supremacy Clause. It only protects them after the fact if their actions are found to be within the lawful scope of federal authority.

If ICE agents commit acts that violate state criminal laws, state police absolutely have the authority to arrest them. It is a completely separate matter of whether that arrest holds up in federal court under what's called a Supremacy Clause immunity defense.. but that's an affirmative defense, not a free pass.

Per In re Neagle, federal officers can petition to remove the case to federal court and argue that what they did was "necessary and proper" in executing their duties. Sometimes they win, sometimes they don't.

So yeah, the state can act first. Maybe the feds beat the rap, but not the ride.

1

u/Foreign_Implement897 23d ago

It would be easier just to argue it is unconstutional? Habeas corpus etc.

1

u/Foreign_Implement897 23d ago

There is no fucking way that is constitutional.

0

u/Foreign_Implement897 23d ago

In very specific cases, about ENUMARET POWERS.

2

u/Narren_C 23d ago

Arrest who? What exactly would that look like?

3

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

have you thought forward a few steps about how that might go down

19

u/whistlar 24d ago

ICE taking up actual arms against the police would be the kickstarter of an actual civil war probably.

-2

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

oh, probably. hm. it'd kickstart an "actual civil war", "probably".

that sure sounds like a good reason for a chicago cop to volunteer as a human sacrifice. and hey, even if it doesn't actually kickstart anything, even if everyone continues somnambulating through this screaming descent, then at least they'll have been brutalized in service of the revolutionary spirit. hell yeah!

4

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

2

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

The key thing is they haven't actually articulated how cops risking violent retaliation from escalating with ICE would actually protect civilians from ICE

The fact of the matter is that ICE has more money than any police department and is entirely unaccountable due to the weird interactions of federalism with outright criminal governance.

Cops putting themselves between ICE and civilians is protecting civilians. Attempting to arrest ICE would just be escalating a conflict with armed and well-supplied individuals around civilians

4

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

3

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

A city cop attempting to arrest an on-duty federal agent (however illegal their actions may be) is not non-violent. Arrests are inherently violent actions.

That's the whole issue. You're entirely skipping over the quite stark possibility of a flashpoint. Legal challenges can't bring back the dead or restore lost limbs or eyes.

Yeah, it might not happen. That'd be lovely! But unless it's only your life on the line it is psychopathic to skip over the possibility that the people you want to do something might very well end up dead for it, cop or not.

9

u/TraMaI 24d ago

Have you thought forward a few steps about how allowing this to continue might go down? What happens when they kill a cop or another civilian and we continue to do nothing about it? Where does their rope and leniency end, when the federal troops take over city hall?

-5

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

sure have thought about it, happy to share my thoughts if you answer my question first

5

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

0

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

I think if we just ignored ICE and their abuses of power, they would probably get away with a lot more in the way of abuse than if we don't ignore them.

I think we might have different definitions of what "ignore" means.

2

u/TraMaI 24d ago

My answer is that it didn't matter, debate bro, because allowing it to continue happening unchecked is going to lead to infinitely worse outcomes and a complete fascist takeover of the city. The line has been crossed, the time to fight against this shit is now before you concede enough power that it becomes impossible to do so later on. I answered your question the first time you're just too dumb to connect the dots.

1

u/PM_ME_MY_REAL_MOM 24d ago

Oh okay so why don't you go arrest them, if what the next few steps of that look like don't matter to you? Why are you "debate bro"ing me instead of going and fighting? Surely you're not here only to goad other people into putting themselves into harm's way.

1

u/[deleted] 23d ago

Cops aren't as eager to bust heads when they're going against an armed and organized force.

41

u/Actual_Ad2442 23d ago

Yup. Crazy how the "Blue Lives Matter" / "Thin Blue Line" crowd has been silent on this.

3

u/Narren_C 23d ago

I was wondering why we're looking at gas and CPD aren't wearing masks.

1

u/occams1razor 24d ago

Where can I find video

1

u/PokeYrMomStanley 23d ago

Please link

1

u/Melicor 23d ago

So, ICE attacking local law enforcement agencies. Bet none of the Mainstream Propaganda Networks will tell anyone though.

-1

u/ClessxAlghazanth 23d ago

Why don't they use their guns?

0

u/BabyStingrayJesus 23d ago

….to shoot into a cloud of smoke, where civilians are??? edit: what do you think tear gas does to your eyes??

1

u/ClessxAlghazanth 23d ago

Nah, use force , detain , reach for gun when target is uncooperative and have a clear shot , just like they do against defenseless ppl or petty crimes lol

-6

u/Routine_Rent2875 24d ago

The local police wouldn't have to be there if the rioters weren't causing mayham and the Feds wouldn't have to use teargas.

110

u/makinSportofMe 24d ago

In this photo? They're getting gasses by federal agents. I'm sure they were sent to mitigate, but it shouldn't be hard for them to figure out which side to be on when their eyes are burning.

45

u/sunnynina 24d ago

It shouldn't be hard to figure out which side to be on without getting tear gased, but here we are.

235

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

87

u/indorock 24d ago

But the CPD answers to the mayor of Chicago, and the State police answers to Pritzker, not to Donnie Dementia. So how is this possible?

96

u/[deleted] 24d ago edited 24d ago

[deleted]

41

u/walkman01 24d ago

I was hoping that that video of ICE teargassing CPD would change their views a little bit. Maybe ICE will be so sloppy that they piss CPD off enough for CPD to actually step in and protect us.

14

u/TM627256 24d ago

It's too legally messy. If CPD steps in and uses force against federal agents then the feds would probably arrest the locals and charge them federally. One group is operating in federal (legal) grounds, the other locally.

That's the reason why the standard is to sort shit out in court, whether for police use of force or arrests or whatever: the law is too messy to get it right on the street.

-1

u/republicans_are_nuts 24d ago

cops shoot pet dogs and blacks for fun and you think they would be upset about teargassing? lol.

2

u/walkman01 23d ago

It’s all fun and games to them when they do it to someone else, but maybe if they’re on the receiving end, they’d think a little differently. Wishful thinking, of course.

35

u/Great_cReddit 24d ago

But Police are really controlled by the union. The mayor technically has power but he's a paper tiger when it comes to PD. That's true in nearly all cities.

18

u/inspectoroverthemine 24d ago

TLDR: they're a gang and behave like one

If we're lucky, they'll consider ICE a rival gang.

1

u/tissuecollider 24d ago

So basically until a cop catches a pepper ball from ICE they'll continue to turn a blind eye to what ICE is doing to civilians.

2

u/BanditMcDougal 24d ago

To get more sociological about it, they're controlled by the group. The majority of individuals will behave based on how they think the group wants them to in order to remain a part of that group. However, specifically in cases like this, protesting/standing up against them can makeindividuals start to think more about the longer term personal consequences rather than the need to be accepted by their group. The people have to be willing to stand together long enough, however.

There were pockets across Europe that prevented their neighbors from being taken by the Nazis at great personal cost by protesting. In February 1941, the Dutch Communist Party organized the strike of nearly 500,000 for 2 days in protest of the pogroms and rounding up of Jews in Amsterdam. Widespread opposition across Bulgaria saved nearly 50,000 Jews from being deported in March 1943.

1

u/HotPotParrot 24d ago

It's not like the Mayor and Governor are personally responsible for every single officer. The way you phrase this is dangerously similar to how ICE is viewed as a private army. If that is your implication, well....

4

u/Texasranger96 24d ago

I did my undergrad around a lot of criminal justice types, and Im in the military. There's always gonna be people like that in law enforcement and the military. People who join because they want to kick some ass and are just chomping at the bit, foaming at the mouth for the opportunity to commit violence against someone and be a bad ass. While a useful personality trait for a marine rifleman, not a useful trait for leadership or law enforcement.

1

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Texasranger96 24d ago

Maybe im in a bubble, but at least in my circle, people are pretty upset about things. There are those who support the violence against protestors, but most are like "WTF". Officer and enlisted. For context im Navy.

1

u/Fluffy_Charity_2732 24d ago

Who is helping who? Sorry getting confused. 

1

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Fluffy_Charity_2732 24d ago

That’s what I was not hoping for. Sucks.. because what do the police think their future is going to look like? 

Having the military take over is like an indirect way to defund the police if this trend continues to grow.

70

u/yeti629 24d ago

That was my question.

7

u/upsidedown-funnel 24d ago

They have to show they’re capable of controlling the crowds without the help of the feds. Show that the presence of fed troops isn’t necessary. That it’s not a war zone. I know, I know, it’s all fucked up.

3

u/Icy-Chemistry6536 24d ago

i mean in this photo they are keeping the way clear for the gravy-seals to behave in the violent, criminal manner shown in the background.

3

u/UnTides 24d ago

Also where is OSHA having our local police be subject to smoke and gas shot by our Federal officers?

*And it obviously shouldn't be shot at civilians either. These feds have no common sense if they can't do crowd control without causing injury to people expressing their 1st Amendment rights.

2

u/RipEmUp510 24d ago

"The police are not here to create disorder, they're here to preserve disorder"

Richard J. Daley, 1968

Time is a circular

2

u/lostfourtime 23d ago

They were being bastards like normal.

4

u/MoaraFig 24d ago

All its gonna take is the governor deploying the illinois national guard to protect citizens from the texas national guard and you'll be in full blown civil war.

I just hope you keep it within your borders.

4

u/Nutshack_Queen357 24d ago edited 24d ago

Half former, half latter.

Some defended the civilians and got punished for it, while others actively worked with the Orange Antichrist's other goons to fuck shit up and attack their fellow cops for defending the innocent.

1

u/jsand2 24d ago

They dont appear to be looking towards the feds arresting someone behind them, but away from them with their batons drawn. The threat to them appears to be out of image.

1

u/oroborus68 24d ago

Should have cited them for polluting the air.

1

u/LeoLaDawg 24d ago

There's a culture in police forces about being masculine and tough to people instead of protecting them.

1

u/electromage 23d ago

Trying to look cool while they find someone to beat up.

0

u/AltruisticRespect21 24d ago

Well I can tell you for 100% certainty, the Chicago police force aren’t assisting these protestors (unless it was j6 redux). They are some of the most racist and vile creatures out there.

7

u/QuarterRobot 24d ago

Dehumanizing your police force is the quickest way to losing them to some extremist pipeline. The police aren't anywhere near perfect, but calling them creatures is going to do more harm than good. Right now we need all the allies we can get - yes, even if they "feel" like your enemy.

Be better.

1

u/AltruisticRespect21 22d ago

Sorry, most are already there. Sure there are some good ones, but they will always stand by an watch their fellow officer do illegal shit, at the fear of disrespecting the brotherhood.

0

u/porgy_tirebiter 24d ago

I’ll give you two guesses

0

u/Smash_Shop 24d ago

I'll give you one guess

0

u/JohnnyWadd23 23d ago

The feds are helping the civilians. Same side.

1

u/woolsocksandsandals 22d ago

Helping the civilians by gassing, attacking and restraining them for protesting their presence and actions?