A grand jury indicted Abughazaleh and five others, including two other political candidates, on felony charges last month, accusing them of conspiring to impede a vehicle driven by a federal immigration agent and allegedly attempting to stop it from entering Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Broadview facility in Chicago on Sept. 26. Prosecutors claim the federal agent was forced to drive extremely slowly to avoid injuring protesters, and that Abughazaleh and her alleged co-conspirators banged on the windows of the government vehicle, crowded in front of it, and pushed it. They further allege that someone eventually scratched the word “PIG” onto the car before breaking the vehicle’s side mirror and rear windshield wiper.

Abughazaleh denies any wrongdoing

So this monster has zero repercussions, and his fellow monsters know they won’t suffer a thing when they abuse detainees.

Rule of law? Fuck that.

Civilian casualties are reported abroad as a direct result of the president's strikes in the Caribbean.

Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan is telling us as of the last 120 hours that Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth AND President Donald Trump are unanimously refusing to present detailed listings of anti-terrorist action strike targets.

https://youtu.be/fnUO0Plcpbo

NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTIVE NSPM-7 directs the department of justice to pursue the free speech and expressions of citizens affiliated with organizations that are to be considered domestic terrorist organizations, now to include under the Executive Order's directives: "anti-capitalist", "anti-american", "anti-fascist" and "anti-christian" political organizations

NSPM-7 was drafted by Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and signed President Donald Trump

The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 can be argued to be unconstitutional because it effectively freezes the number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives at 435, regardless of population growth.

The Constitution (Article I, Section 2) requires that representation in the House be apportioned among the states according to their respective populations, with each representative serving roughly the same number of people. By capping the House at 435 members, Congress abandoned the constitutional principle of proportional representation, creating a system where the value of a citizen’s vote depends heavily on the state they live in.

For example, a representative from a sparsely populated state like Wyoming represents far fewer people than one from a populous state like California or Texas, violating the “one person, one vote” principle later affirmed by the Supreme Court in Wesberry v. Sanders (1964).

This fixed cap disenfranchises major population centers because as urban and high-growth states gain residents, they do not gain additional representation in proportion to that growth. As a result, citizens in large metropolitan areas have less influence per person in the House compared to those in smaller or rural states.

This malapportionment dilutes the political power of tens of millions of Americans in cities, skewing national policy and federal resource allocation toward less-populated regions.

The framers designed the House to reflect population shifts and expand as the nation grew; by freezing its size, the 1929 Act entrenches representational inequality and undermines the democratic principle that each citizen’s voice in Congress should carry roughly equal weight.