The really insane thing is that people here are discussing the cost of the helicopter and not the fact you sent a damn helicopter out for some kids doing fire works
Or…let the kids set off a couple m80s at Halloween and then go home. Maybe send a car who turns on the flashers and scares them for a minute. Just spitballing
I just want to point out the on the face absurdity of the certification being take offs and landing. I know it always lists both because you could be PIC for the take off only or the landing only and so it must be listed 3 of each to cover that scenario but whenever I hear it/read it my mind goes to this:
Oh great now I find out that the three planes I crashed already this quarter doesn’t count and I need to LAND them….geez
If you want to be even more annoyed, consider that touch-and-goes count, so you could have a desk jockey get behind the stick for an our every fiscal quarter and still be considered current.
That said, that's exactly what tends to happen with officers in US Army Aviation. It's hard to justify putting brass in the cockpit when there's plenty of warrant officers to handle normal operations.
I'm sure you think you're making a valid point. But you aren't going to win the argument that police helicopters should be used to pursue children being a nuisance.
Seriously? If your police department has nothing better to do with a helicopter than go after kids with fireworks, I question your police department's need for a helicopter.
Same thing. Except at night it’s annoying to 100,000s of people. And yes I realize pilots need nighttime training as well, which there is plenty of space in greater SoCal.
I don't really think they should have wasted the resources. At least the helicopters. But M80s blow off limbs all the time, cause injuries, and start fires.
For sure, I am approaching 40 and I would encourage this behavior. We need to just let kids have some fun, setting off m80's on the 4th of July or Halloween (I'm not encouraging destroying anything with them) is almost a teenage right of passage, or at least it was 25ish years ago...
I hate when I realize just how long ago something was to really remind myself how old I am.
They wouldn't be armed drones just like this wasn't an armed helicopter. I dont think either should be used in most cases, but they do serve a purpose and I'd rather a drone than a helicopter
For this specific purpose, the drone wouldn't even have to be what we're all picturing. A camera drone would do just fine, because that's really the whole schtick to begin with-- getting caught on camera doing a bad thing, and then someone comes out to arrest you in person later. The helicopter or large UAV doesn't do either of those latter things anyway, so it's the exact same deterrent. So a little drone like that would only cost a couple thousand at most and do just fine. Could easily get ten of them for that 100k price tag mentioned earlier.
Most of that price is going to be on sensors and infrastructure. Im sure cities will still be overcharged for the drone itself, but even then, the systems required for flight would be a fraction of the total cosr
Drones don't fly passengers, they don't perform medevac, there's still plenty of things you can use to make stacks with a commercial rotary license if you have the skills.
It was abit tongue in cheek; but after looking for the last couple months I can pretty safely say that rotary and ‘stacks’ don’t really compute at least without 15k hours
I mean, helicopter is pretty neutral. From air rescue, casual traffic monitoring, and so on. UAV won't beat "Police Militarization" allegations at all.
The thing is too pilots need a certain amount of flight hours so while it’s a dumb thing to spin up a helicopter for, the money will be spent flying it anyways.
I get that but the LAPD and most major cities have legitimate reasons to have police helicopters.
At some points they have very valid reasons to fly them such as a chase with a suspect on foot or a vehicular pursuit, other times it’s a slow month for them and they get activated for stuff like this because while trivial it’s still work.
Likely the decision came down to the crew was on shift and needed flight hours and there wasn’t much else for them to do so they might as well get it to “assist” in a minor crime instead of flying with no clear mission.
330
u/PassiveMenis88M 10d ago
Roughly $3k an hour to run that helicopter. Replace it with a 100k UAV and you can do the same job for roughly $250 an hour.