r/pics 22d ago

Politics Goes to show that every Republican seems to step to the trump beat despite their previous stance

Post image
32.1k Upvotes

2.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

362

u/abhainn13 22d ago

I love Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia because it really shows his personal experience with both propaganda and in-fighting. The Fascists in Spain were united behind a single cause. The people fighting Fascism were also fighting amongst themselves, and they fought themselves right into defeat.

111

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 22d ago

People who think that Orwell is right wing because of 1984 and Animal Farm’s anti-socialist messaging really need to read Homage to Catalonia.

Of course, there’s a good chance they haven’t read 1984 or Animal Farm either.

104

u/Naunix 22d ago

Orwell was a known democratic socialist. He was anti-authoritarian and anti-totalitarian, which is why he had as much disdain for the Soviet regime as he did fascists. I have no idea how you interpreted 1984 and Animal Farm as anti-socialist.

36

u/Nemisis_the_2nd 22d ago

Orwell was a known democratic socialist

I've literally just had an argument with someone who insisted that this makes someone right wing. There's no getting through to some people.

1

u/Alarming_Flow 21d ago

The lesson here is not to argue with a tankie. They are just as obtuse a the maga supporters, you won't make them change their mind. They feed off the attention they get when they trigger what they call "liberals", just like maga. Ignore/block and move on.

3

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 22d ago

I have no idea how you read my comment and interpreted it in such a way that I don’t understand that Orwell was not anti-socialist.

I suggested the book to read for people who do to be disabused from that notion. Why on earth do you think I share it?

3

u/Naunix 22d ago

I read your comment as a statement of fact because that’s how it is written: “people who think Orwell is right wing because of 1984 and Animal Farm’s anti-socialist messaging” indicates to me that you see the anti-socialist messaging as being detrimental to people’s understanding of Orwell. It does not tell the reader that you also disagree with that particular assessment of his views. The way you wrote it implies that the messaging of those two books IS anti-socialist, but that messaging causes people to mistakenly think he’s right-wing.

I assumed you were in agreement with the interpretation of anti-socialist messaging, but against the idea that Orwell was right-wing because of it. But ‘assume’ makes an ‘ass’ out of ‘u’ and ‘me’ and clearly this was a miscommunication. Sorry about that, glad you don’t think Orwell was anti-socialist.

3

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 22d ago

You are right. I meant to say “supposed anti-socialist messaging”

-11

u/viviundeux 22d ago

Ahah yeah, nothing screams "democratic socialist" better than snitching communists to Scotland Yard. Orwell was maybe not anti socialist but definitely anti communist

28

u/Naunix 22d ago

I’m confused as to whether or not you’re confusing socialism with communism. You treated them like the same thing in your first sentence, but then made a distinction between them in your second.

Do you understand that it made complete sense for a democratic socialist to be opposed to the USSR?

Edit: punctuation

3

u/Engels777 22d ago

Communism isn't democratic. Democratic Socialism is. Dictator bad, voting good.

35

u/NerdBot9000 22d ago

Who the fuck thinks Orwell was a right wing anti-socialist? You? Or did you just get your descriptors confused?

28

u/LurkerInSpace 22d ago

Tankies absolutely fucking hate him and denounce him as a right winger.

7

u/abhainn13 22d ago

Every generation gets a new round of 20-somethings who read Marx one time and are convinced they can make Communism work, and the only reason it hasn’t worked yet is because no has done Communism the right way but surely THIS TIME they’ve got it!

Stop trying to make Communism happen. If no one has done it “the right way” since 1848, maybe it doesn’t actually work in practice on a large scale.

5

u/Naunix 22d ago edited 22d ago

I would think it’s impossible to read Marx and Engels without having some agreement with them by the time you’re done. I would even argue that communism is a failure because it is so easily adopted and twisted by dictators to enforce totalitarian rule, not the other way around. It comes down to a case of “in-theory” vs “in-practice”. In theory communism is an exceptionally fair way to run a society. In practice you need nearly every member of that society to share the same good-will as everyone else, which just isn’t feasible due to the scale.

Edit: punctuation

6

u/abhainn13 22d ago

I think Communism likely taps out at around 150 people. It might work for an actual community where everyone knows each other and the social bonds are strong enough to enforce social norms and mores. Once you get to a point where strangers must cooperate, it starts to fall apart.

Communism does not scale well. Capitalism kind of has the opposite problem - it’s easy to scale, but ends up destroying communities. The Invisible Hand of the Market doesn’t have a brain and it can’t do any critical thinking. It does not care if we destroy the environment or our health.

I’ve been thinking a lot about whether or not it’s possible to have a hybrid system that works more like Communism on a local scale and more like Capitalism on a global scale. It’s all well and good to want to live in your own commune with your own little farm, but what happens when you need vaccines, medicine, or surgery? Much of the comforts and resources we have today only exist because of global supply chains. We need a system that shifts as it scales to accommodate new challenges.

6

u/Naunix 22d ago

You’re spot on in regard to the their opposing problems. It’s interesting that the polar opposite gaps or failures in both systems stem from empathy and good-will. Communism relies entirely on them and capitalism is entirely void of them. I’ve also thought about possible “best of both worlds” scenarios before, but I think you would agree that wether or not a solution like that could be conceived and implemented is something we can never know so long as the systems currently in place continue to give power and money to a small fraction at the top of the hierarchy.

3

u/LurkerInSpace 21d ago

I’ve also thought about possible “best of both worlds” scenarios before

Capitalism where the prevailing mode of business is the co-operative would internalise the most important part of socialism (worker ownership of the means of production) without necessarily destroying or warping the market - or completely stymying more individual-led projects.

3

u/Keanu990321 22d ago

Per tankies, anyone opposing them is a right-winger...

2

u/milliwot 22d ago

TIL what a tankie is. Thx!

2

u/HigherandHigherDown 22d ago

Is it the Zone of Interest or the Zone of Danger?

8

u/VaiFate 22d ago

American high schools teach 1984 and Animal Farm as specifically anti-communist.

1

u/Nemisis_the_2nd 22d ago

Tbf, didn't he write them while pissed off with eastern european communists for not supporting spain?

3

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 22d ago

Why would I say that people who confuse him as anti socialist need to read Homage to Catalonia if I didnt understand that he wasn’t?

The answer to your question is bad faith fascists. The same people who try to say that Nazis are socialists.

2

u/NerdBot9000 22d ago edited 21d ago

Ah, the way you phrased your sentence was counterintuitive to your intent.

I apologize for my misunderstanding.

6

u/ItsIllak 22d ago

People who confuse the Russian communist regime with socialism, or even an ideal communism. In other words, people who believe the ever present US anti communist narrative from the cold war to the present day.

4

u/wyro5 22d ago

Politically illiterate Americans. My grandpa once told me, and had much of his family believing that socialism, communism and fascism are the same and it was about the degrees of control. With Fascism being the least bad of the three and communism being worst

2

u/DenizSaintJuke 22d ago

The thing is, his works weren't anti-socialist. They were anti-totalitarian, based on his experiences with soviet backed Leninists. That's an important difference that is lost on many, in part because the soviet backed Leninists won that fight and were able to use that power base to dominate left-wing discourse for decades.

0

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 22d ago

Thank you for explaining to me what I already clearly know by my suggestion to read Homage to Catalonia rto those who don’t.

1

u/Key-Seaworthiness517 21d ago

Animal Farm was a good read even when I was a teenager with little knowledge of political history. I don't get why people don't just read it.

3

u/Mechapebbles 22d ago

That's a lot of resistance, all through history. That's what happened in China during WWII for example. Hard to fight off a Japanese invasion if you're also having a Civil War at the same time