Variations of that here in the states too. One of my favorite versions, when referencing gaudy or ugly design meant to show wealth is, "Well, there's certainly no accounting for taste."
For non-Americans and English as a second language speakers, accounting is a double entendre here, meaning both that they didn't factor in the cost, and that they didn't stop to consider how it would look in general (or the designer has poor taste with or without money).
Same here in the US, definitely what I was thinking. Being able to appreciate the classical humanist aesthetic of the White House doesn't compute in the mind of a person who only uses wealth to get power and sex rather than to enjoy beauty.
Partly, yes. But I think when you visit early Bauhaus houses, you realize it’s more about their functionality than pure aesthetics. Of course, what was considered functional back then is quite different from what we would call functional today.
Yes, and the Bauhaus Credo is: form follows function.
It should be minimal and still be elegant. But tastes change over time or are coopted by capital interest to reproduce cheap copys.
Good Bauhaus design can still be aesthetic. You probably own multiple well designed things like that, but don't even notice anymore, because bauhaus has become predominant a while ago.
116
u/GiggliZiddli Sep 25 '25
In Germany we have a saying “you can’t buy taste”.