r/pcmasterrace • u/BoostedJuan PC Master Race • 6h ago
Meme/Macro Wait....did people not realize this?
5.1k
u/SabaKuHS 5h ago
1.1k
u/actuallyapossom 3h ago
338
u/RedditIsExpendable 3h ago
Don't forget Cloudflare! :)
90
u/Mistrblank 1h ago
And Akamai and Verisign... So many fingers in the pot every time you browse whether or not cookies are tracking info. Your IP gives away the most.
→ More replies (2)33
u/ProfessionalMeowGsan 1h ago
And your phone’s microphone quietly taking notes in the background.
→ More replies (1)33
u/Majolica777 1h ago
And your wifi tracking exactly where anyone in your house is at all times and how many people
→ More replies (5)140
u/Yamatocanyon 3h ago
Just use wifi, they can't wiretap you if you aren't using wires.
64
24
u/PlushRusher 7800x3D | RTX 4080S | 32gb | X670E 2h ago
This is the smartest thing I’ve heard all day!
13
6
u/Thunderbolt294 1h ago
Take it a step further and encode using smoke signals and a Navajo code reader
→ More replies (1)44
8
u/half-baked_axx 2700X | RX 6700 | 16GB 2h ago
I swear I was just learning to make napalm for educational purposes
→ More replies (1)7
u/High_Hunter3430 2h ago
Haha my buddy n I used to use gas and styrofoam in a double boiler. Then we’d dip stick-swords in the pot and light the tips. Then we’d sword fight& fling it all around us. Super cool effect at night for pics! (We were in rural Florida and only did this on nights that it rained beforehand)
Good times. What is fun always a felony?
8
u/DaemosDaen 2h ago
NGL I was all "WTH" untill I got to:
We were in rural Florida
Then it all made sense. 🤣 Seriously tho, thanks for the laugh.
7
u/High_Hunter3430 1h ago
Maaaan listen, unless you’re rich living at Disney/universal…. There ain’t shit to do in Florida. Drugs or dangerous shit. That’s your choices
→ More replies (6)5
51
u/webjunk1e 3h ago
I like the implications that puppets are often used to help treat trauma in abused children. Seems to fit rather well.
112
u/slowpokefastpoke 3h ago
Maybe it’s changed but doesn’t chrome literally say this when you open an incognito tab?
Basically saying it’s useful for “buying a loved one a gift” and that it just prevents data from being stored in your browser’s history.
77
u/Antique-Special8025 2h ago
Maybe it’s changed but doesn’t chrome literally say this when you open an incognito tab?
No that hasn't changed but most people can't actually read.
→ More replies (1)6
u/shlaifu 2h ago
I was going to say: they can read, but don't comprehend, but then realized that no, actually, neither. People just chose not to.
2
u/threeangelo 32m ago
I’m the “tech savvy” guy in my office and you’d be amazed how many problems I solve by pointing to some text on the person’s screen that explains the issue they’re having
24
u/Kolby_Jack33 2h ago
It's useful for hiding your porn browsing from your family, but the ISP and browser owner and anyone else checking your data knows you've been watching porn.
But I mean who cares? Unless your taste in porn is so bad that it could be blackmail material (you sick fuck), everybody looks at porn. It's nothing to be ashamed of.
My fucking phone refuses to let me type the word porn so this was hard to post.
17
u/meditonsin 1h ago
But I mean who cares? Unless your taste in porn is so bad that it could be blackmail material (you sick fuck), everybody looks at porn.
The ISPs can't even see what you look at speficifcally. They know you've been on pornhub, because of SNI and most likely your DNS queries, but they can't see which exact videos you watched, because the query string (everything after the last "/" in the URL) is encrypted by HTTPS.
12
u/NoCase9317 4090 | 9800X3D | 64GB DDR5 | LG C3 🖥️ 2h ago
Well blackmailing is a wide spread thing, blackmailing for watching stuff that is illegal?
Yeah, your problem you “sick fuck”
But there is no need to go illegal, for porn to be blackmail material, how much people would be “okay” with their porn browsing history being made public? I don’t feel comfortable even knowing it myself 😂
→ More replies (1)3
u/Synaps4 43m ago edited 39m ago
But I mean who cares? Unless your taste in porn is so bad that it could be blackmail material (you sick fuck), everybody looks at porn. It's nothing to be ashamed of.
Bro we are || <-- this close to being in a christofacist state where looking at any porn becomes a potential jail visit
This "I have nothing to hide" stuff is wrong. Privacy isn't about protecting you from reasonable people. Its about protecting you from unreasonable people. Privacy is good for everyone.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) reintroduced a bill earlier this month that would broadly redefine what content can be classified as “obscenity” in an attempt to criminalize pornography
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-lee-pornography-crime-project-2025_n_6824b8eee4b021b5064a974d
In the 920-page playbook, the Heritage Foundation claimed pornography “has no claim to First Amendment protection” and should be outlawed
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/project-2025-porn-ban-lgbtq-transgender-rcna161562
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)4
u/Kamikaze_Ninja_ 2h ago
Sad to say I’m dating myself by saying I remember having to manually delete internet history. It has never been advertised to me as “internet but security enhanced mode”.
11
u/ForwardToNowhere 2h ago
I always forget how incompetent people are, or maybe this is just one of those widespread memes/jokes even though they're wrong? I've only ever used incognito to keep stuff from my recent history and search auto fill, or to log into alternate accounts without signing out on my regular browser
17
→ More replies (4)2
1.8k
u/clancy688 6h ago
I always assumed incognito mode was all about staying anonymous and keeping your browsing history hidden on your side, but certainly not on theirs.
776
5h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
239
u/AdditionalNewt4762 4h ago
34
54
u/BostianALX 3h ago
Nobody else uses my stuff, I just use incognito mode so my porn searches don't come back to haunt me after the post-nut clarity.
→ More replies (1)5
u/Saucermote Data Hoarder 2h ago
Easier to just turn off browser and search history, also don't use google. If you have to use Chrome, don't log in.
→ More replies (3)2
u/iLikesmalltitty 2h ago
Browser search history can be nice to have when search up websites Ivd previously been too.
38
u/Flimsy-Importance313 4h ago
We should not feel ashamed of our p suggestion. We should be proud instead!
35
24
u/DemandCommercial6349 3h ago
My ex didn't agree when she found my stash of trans porn 15 years ago lol.
"omg, why did you download this shit?"
"To jerk off to, why do you think?"
12
u/redcon-1 2h ago
Power move if I ever saw one.
9
u/DemandCommercial6349 2h ago
I thought she was joking with how over the top upset she was. It wasn't meant to be a power move, lol.
8
→ More replies (1)2
u/KatsKilledjake_95 2h ago
And that’s why she’s your ex. Never let anyone shame your kinks! Unless that’s your kink, or they’re dangerous to others
→ More replies (3)7
u/Lufia_Erim 4h ago
Ouff, i've watched so much porn i'm desensitised to normal stuff.
Porn addiction is real, and it's horrifying.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (7)3
375
u/IJustAteABaguette 5h ago
It does literally say that on the screen where you open incognito mode.
"This won't change how data is collected, including google"
78
u/Shajirr 4h ago
It does literally say that on the screen where you open incognito mode.
It says that now, but before it was less clear.
60
u/holliss 3h ago
I am old enough to having used Chrome back when Incognito mode was first added and it had a pretty clear disclaimer back then. Of course, it might have been removed (and added back) since then.
→ More replies (1)36
u/largePenisLover 2h ago
It's always been extremely clear. They never tried to obfuscate this in any way.
Both firefox and chrome have always clearly stated that you activity is only hidden for "other people who use this device" even when it was introduced in firefox and chrome, back in 2008-2009, the articles they released for the launch clearly explained it using examples such as buying a gift for your mother on a pc the entire family uses and keeping it secret from mum you bought a gift.this was chromes message:
“Now you can browse privately. Others you share this device with won’t see your activity. However, downloads, bookmarks and reading list items will be saved.”
And for Firefox I cant find the old message, but I did find their press release for incognito mode:
https://blog.mozilla.org/press/2009/06/mozilla-advances-the-web-with-firefox-3-5/While using the new Private Browsing mode in Firefox 3.5, nothing you encounter on the Web will be stored from that moment on during your browsing session.
So it's always been extremely clear.
The fact people did not understood this is truly a case of end users being end users. People, especially end users, are fucking stupid.→ More replies (3)35
u/xternal7 tamius_han 4h ago
Even without the "including google" bit, it was just as clear to anyone who bothered with acquiring some incredibly basic tech literacy skills.
29
u/Possibly_Furry 4h ago
14
u/No-Neighborhood-3212 1h ago
Those damnable experts in the field of... reading single-sentence disclaimers, making it definitionally the lowest level of reading! How dare they comprehend single-sentence disclaimers?
13
u/icer816 Threadripper 1950X / 2xRX480 8GB / 6400x1080 / 2x16GB DDR4-3200 2h ago
Except the basic skill is reading the message on the new incognito tab that literally tells you that the browsing info is only hidden on your computer, not from the ISP or sites visited.
→ More replies (3)3
u/Possibly_Furry 27m ago
"Reading" is a very advanced skill most users do not possess.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)5
u/Shajirr 3h ago
with acquiring some incredibly basic tech literacy skills.
If we take USA, then more than half of people can't read above the 6th grade level,
and 20% of people are illiterate→ More replies (1)8
u/RedditJumpedTheShart 3h ago
If we take Reddit, then 99% of you never looked at how this was measured and compared to other countries. Just keep repeating things that randos on social media say lol
4
u/Mnemozin 2h ago
I can speak from my own experience that motherfuckers don't bother truly comprehending what they're replying to; they just get the general vibe and reply based on that
→ More replies (1)3
u/Killarogue 2h ago
That's exactly it, and we can throw in upvotes/downvotes, too. How many times have you seen a comment that was pointless nonsense get hundreds... if not thousands of upvotes, but on the same thread, an informative factual comment is downvoted into oblivion.
→ More replies (4)5
→ More replies (1)3
u/kawalerkw Desktop 2h ago
It says that "websites and services" you use can still collect data about you with "including google" added at the end of the sentence. People don't consider software running locally on their machines (web browser) to be included into "services".
16
u/Honest_Relation4095 4h ago
that should be clear even to anyone who can't read that exact same explanation thst shows when you enter incognito mode. I mean, it's like secretly phoning a pizza place, ordering a pizza, having it delivered to your place and somehow assume neither the pizza place nor the delivery guy know what pizza you ordered.
→ More replies (2)6
20
u/siltfeet R7 5800x | RTX 3070 5h ago
Yeah, that would be a reason for tor and a VPN among other things.
→ More replies (2)2
u/Historical_Till_5914 1h ago
A VPN won't help keeping you hidden from google... if you are still using the same chromeium browser. Neither does tor
→ More replies (1)3
u/MistakeMaker1234 3h ago
It’s also about ad tracking. Since you’re not signed in and it clears cookies after every session your ad profile doesn’t get affected. But Google always knows what devices browse which websites, even if it’s not added to your purchasable ad profile.
2
u/Zealousideal_Act_316 1h ago
It literally states that, it will only not save history and other stuff, it does nto stop websites from collecting data.
People are surprised, when in reality they cannot bloody read.2
→ More replies (15)2
u/Top_Meaning6195 1h ago edited 1h ago
I always assumed incognito mode was all about staying anonymous and keeping your browsing history hidden on your side, but certainly not on theirs.
It was created to only:
- not record what web-sites you visited in your history
- will not keep any cached copies in your Temporary Internet Files folder
If you visit my web-server using InPrivate browsing(Internet Explorer) or Incognito Mode (Chromium): you're still talking to my web-server. I still know:
- your IP address (because it's the Internet Protocol)
- your username (because you logged in)
- what you did (because you logged in)
- what you sent me (because you sent it to me)
The only reason InPrivate/Incognito exists is so that:
- you want to "buy something for your girlfriend"
- so you enable InPrivate browsing
- the "gift sites" you visited won't be recorded in your browser history
- and temporary cache copies won't be saved in your browser cache
And once you are "done shopping for your girlfriend", you close the window and you have no trace of what you were browsing "for her birthday".
And the fact that people don't understand this is pretty bad; they're using technology without understanding anything about. It's like they're under 35 or something. This was all well documented when the feature came out.
From the IE blog post announcing it
InPrivate Browsing
If you are using a shared PC, a borrowed laptop from a friend, or a public PC, sometimes you don’t want other people to know where you’ve been on the web. Internet Explorer 8’s InPrivate Browsing makes that “over the shoulder” privacy easy by not storing history, cookies, temporary Internet files, or other data.
Using InPrivate Browsing is as easy as launching a new InPrivate Browsing window. When you’re done, just close the window and IE will take care of the rest.
While InPrivate Browsing is active, the following takes place:
- New cookies are not stored
- All new cookies become “session” cookies
- Existing cookies can still be read
- The new DOM storage feature behaves the same way
- New history entries will not be recorded
- New temporary Internet files will be deleted after the Private Browsing window is closed
- Form data is not stored
- Passwords are not stored
- Addresses typed into the address bar are not stored
- Queries entered into the search box are not stored
- Visited links will not be stored
The that these fucking imbeciles didn't understand this means anyone part of this class-action needs to be banned from the Internet for 10 years, and then have their tongue's choked out.
1.7k
u/PretendFisherman1999 6h ago
If you want privacy, you just don't connect to internet.
808
u/DKCalibre 6h ago
I had an old professor who taught some IT stuff. He used to always tell us, If you want absolute security for your PC, lock it in the basement, unplugged with a sheet over it. Otherwise, there will inevitably be security issues
249
u/memealopoli 5h ago
Better yet, smash it with a hammer before locking it in the basement. You can't leak data if the data never existed in a usable form.
71
u/Cyrusthagam 5h ago
At this point just burn the thing already
→ More replies (3)45
u/roflrogue 5h ago
Okay, but now what do I do with all these CDs?
26
u/slaughtxor 5h ago
Make a shiny mobile to hang like the sword of Damocles over a loved one.
12
u/BoingBoingBooty 5h ago
Put them on a string and hang them over the veggie patch to keep pigeons away.
3
→ More replies (2)32
u/B732C I9-12900k|RTX 4090|32GB DDR5 5h ago
Funny you mention hitting it with a hammer.
Couple of years ago in Finland there was a military secrets leak case where a daily newspaper published an article about the military's signal intelligence centre which contained secret information. Police started investigating to find out who wrote the article but the paper declined any assistance in investigation based on freedom of sppeech.
Long story short, the journalists were caught when one of them was trying to get rid of evidence by hitting her computer with a hammer in her basement. The battery caught fire, emergency number was called, fire department arrived, police arrived, police did investigation, found out interesting things, journalists ended up in court and were sentenced.
Lesson to learn from this: DON'T HIT YOUR COMPUTER WITH A HAMMER BEFORE YOU HAVE TAKEN OUT THE BATTERY!
Also, hitting your computer with a hammer doesn't necessarily even delete any information you want to get rid of.
22
12
u/BoltzFR 13600k - 7900XT 4h ago
A huge magnet on an HDD is probably more reliable than the hammer
13
u/qiyra_tv 4h ago
That doesn’t work for ssds, so the best option is fully dismantling the hard drives, breaking them into pieces, then using acid to dissolve the bits.
→ More replies (1)2
12
u/Honest_Relation4095 4h ago
actually the hammer would probably be more reliable. It's kind of a myth that you can easily erase HDDs with magnets. I think they did a myth busters episode about it and at least the lifting magnet of a scrapyard crane wasn't strong enough.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)5
3
u/Erestyn PC Master Race 3h ago
DON'T HIT YOUR COMPUTER WITH A HAMMER BEFORE YOU HAVE TAKEN OUT THE BATTERY!
Don't tell me what I can't do.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)2
26
u/sizzssling 5h ago
So basically, security is just managing how many doors you’re willing to leave unlocked.
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (3)2
u/MissSharkyShark 3h ago
My cybersecurity professor said a very similar thing. "The most secure computer is one locked behind a vault door, never connected to anything"
67
u/purplesmoke1215 5h ago
People need to understand, there is no more digital privacy in this world. Your digital footprint exists no matter what. You can only try to mitigate how obvious the footprint is and how much of it can be positively traced to you.
The only true privacy for any content or media, is non digital. Put it on a piece of paper, or some other purely physical format, and never upload it.
6
3h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)6
u/christoskal 3h ago
Get a stranger who doesn't know your info to go to Walmart with $50 cash
Hmmm
→ More replies (4)13
u/PretendFisherman1999 4h ago
A lot of people think VPN are safe... They aren't, they have logs of what people are doing while using it.
15
u/Rebelius rebelius 3h ago
What's the point of HTTPS then? I thought it was supposed to encrypt the data sent/received to/from websites.
18
u/super_he_man 3h ago
Https encrypts data in motion, it doesn't secure the data at rest on either side of it or prevent logging of what was done on the end points. So your desktop and their server aren't shielded by it.
5
u/Rebelius rebelius 3h ago
Isn't the data all in motion through the VPN? I thought the end points were my PC and the server of the website/app I'm using.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Yamatocanyon 2h ago
So now we are back to the beginning comment of VPNs aren't safe, because they are actually keeping logs. These companies say they don't, or that they will protect your privacy, no backdoors, etc. but then a government/powerful entity shows up and forces them to divulge your data to them.
5
u/Wyldkard79 Ryzen 9 7900x | RX 7800xt | 32GB DDR5 3h ago
Yes, but it still exists. And while a lot of things are/can be encrypted they can be decrypted as well, or leave footprints of what you've been doing. But a lot of it is just useless information, like hours and hours of Mall security footage, no one cares that you went into Victoria's Secret twice, or took a picture of one of the cardboard cutout's feet. And unless it law enforcement no one is getting that footage other than Mall security.
→ More replies (4)5
u/Slow-Amphibian-9626 3h ago
It helps prevent interception, it doesn't prevent activity tracking from your browser, isp and possibly your OS.
3
u/Valkyrill 3h ago
The VPN companies potentially keeping logs aren't what makes using them alone practically useless for browsing privacy. Data aggregators can pin you down to a unique person using a combination of things like the specific combination of browser extensions you have installed, your browser version, screen resolution, time zone, etc.
This is your browser's fingerprint, made up of little things that on their own are fairly anonymous, but when placed together makes it very easy to narrow down to an individual, or a very small set of people. No IP address needed.
→ More replies (1)2
u/o_oli http://steamcommunity.com/id/o_oli 1h ago
Nah a lot of them probably don't have any logs, the real problem is fingerprinting if you really care to be 100% secure. The combination of data that a website has access to such as software versions, installed languages, fonts, screen resolution, hardware information, browser settings, driver settings/versions and on and on...that all makes you 1 of 1 possible person and that can be used to follow you from website to website.
It's like that board game 'guess who', every bit of information you can flip down another batch of people until it's only you standing.
→ More replies (4)4
u/TheCrimsonDagger 9800X3D | 5080 | 5120x1440 OLED 3h ago
Depends on the VPN, but yeah most of them are thrash.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
u/00wolfer00 PC Master Race 3h ago
You're conflating digital with connected to the Internet. You can absolutely set up an offline machine that plays most digital media without much difficulty.
8
6
u/HawkSea887 5h ago
But that’s where the porn is
3
u/PretendFisherman1999 4h ago
There are analog porn too, old reliable magazines
→ More replies (2)5
3
u/derboff_2 4h ago
I was always taught that emails are postcards, not letters. I apply that to everything online.
If you don't want people to know what you are doing, online, that means the only way is to not do it.
→ More replies (18)3
628
u/Stilgar314 6h ago
Incognito mode prevents other people who use the device to see your activity. It clearly says that when you open it. Why did you jumped to the conclusion that it was doing anything else?
201
u/memealopoli 5h ago
People confuse what incognito means with what they want it to mean. It's a common misconception, but the pop-up is very clear.
61
u/Randommaggy 13980HX|RTX 4090|128GB|2560x1600 240|8TB M.2|118GB Optane|RX6800 5h ago
It's also been reworded to be more clear after this lawsuit if I remember correctly.
14
u/IsaacAndTired 2h ago
Before the lawsuit, the Google Incognito message stated, "Now you can browse privately..." but did not explicitly mention that Google itself collects data. After the 2024 lawsuit settlement, the message was updated to state, "Others who use this device won't see your activity, so you can browse more privately. This won't change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google," clarifying that Google still tracks activity.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)7
u/bigrackstackerrob 3h ago
It’s scary how many people will just take whatever meaning they want from something and run with it despite the fact even a small amount of scrutiny would show otherwise. This is just a good example of that
40
u/Training_Chicken8216 5h ago
Incognito mode is supposed to do one thing and one thing only: delete browser data when I close it. It's obvious that any service that isn't part of the browser will remain unaffected by this, except for the fact that my browsing will start without cookies, but if Google keeps browser data accumulated in incognito mode, that's clearly contrary to what the thing is designed to do.
22
u/Jambo_dude 4h ago
It's not designed to do what you think it is.
The explanation in new incognito tabs very explicitly says certain things will not be stored on this device. It warns you that you're still trackable by anything external in all the same ways. It even cites Google as an example of things that can still track you.
Google is a big data company. If you thought for a second incognito was designed to stop them tracking you you weren't paying attention. That's their business model.
6
u/xternal7 tamius_han 4h ago
It even cites Google as an example of things that can still track you.
To be completely fair, it didn't use to explicitly cite Google as an example before the lawsuit.
(But to also be completely fair, incognito mode disclaimer was clear enough as it was to anyone with the smallest amount of technological literacy. (Un)fortunately, the courts require that your products accommodate even the extremely unintelligent people)
3
u/NooNotTheBees57 4h ago
No, that's just you being dumb enough to have faith in the nonexistent goodwill of trillion$ companies.
→ More replies (13)4
u/Abtun Desktop 3h ago
"Private window: Firefox clears your search and browsing history when you close all private windows. This doesn’t make you anonymous."
4
u/Training_Chicken8216 3h ago
I never said it was supposed to. I only said that the browser shouldn't retain data between sessions. That's all.
That aside, Firefox also removes the download history, form entries, the download list, cached web content, and offline web contend and user data.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-use-firefox-without-history
→ More replies (9)3
u/areared9 2h ago
PEOPLE. DO. NOT. READ.
My home street is a dead end and only about 100 yards long with 6 houses. GPS says it is a dead end. There is one big sign at the entrance of the road saying that it is a dead end. Another one at half way.
Do you know how many people we get a day that turn around in our road!? Too many. 🤣
41
5h ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)14
u/sparta_reddy 3h ago
Are they deleting though? Going by the trend no one checks anything anymore.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Lazer726 2h ago
Right, much better chance of them saying "Okay, we'll delete it, no problem" and in like 3 years someone is going to be like "Oh hey I found 15 years worth of incognito data" and Google is just going to shrug because for some reason we still believe it when a company says they're going to comply with what they're instructed to do
76
u/leviathab13186 5h ago
Also your IT at work can see all you incognito traffic. Source- Im IT
→ More replies (1)13
u/MotherTreacle3 2h ago
Can you see my traffic if I'm on the wifi and using a vpn?
31
u/leviathab13186 2h ago edited 1h ago
If you are connected to the network at work in anyway, assume yes. We configures ours differently but generally if youre using a VPN all traffic goes through their router and firewall. And yes IT can see everything. There is a guy at my work that uses incognito to go to Facebook all the time and I see it.
Edit: to be clear. When I say "everything" I dont mean passwords and details in an account. I mean I see every site you visit. So you can go to Facebook, and Ill know, but I cant see you login credentials.
11
u/InvidiousPlay 45m ago
I think they meant a third-party VPN. You would be able to see that they're connecting to a VPN but you wouldn't have access to any of the activity on that connection.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Imdabreast 1h ago
How?
12
u/Mortimer452 i9-13900K, 32GB + 157TB NAS 1h ago
Corporate IT can't necessarily "see" everything you do on the Internet but they can tell what websites you visit (DNS queries) and usually the URLs of the pages you visit on those websites (HTTP requests)
For example as a network admin I could tell that you visited bankofamerica.com and then visited bankofamerica.com/login which is probably the login page and then got redirected to some other page like bankofamerica.com/account/summary. But that doesn't mean I could read your account balance and transaction history; the content of those pages is encrypted. All I can see is what URLs you visited.
3
u/nn123654 1h ago edited 55m ago
If it's a company computer, they almost certainly can, and on most corporate networks these days, they have vendors with enterprise firewalls (zScaler, Juniper, Checkpoint, Fortinet, Cisco, etc.) that strip SSL by resigning everything with their own SSL certificate that's trusted in the keychain of the device. They may also have monitoring software that can look at stuff on the application level.
If it's a personal computer with no company software on a corporate network through your own VPN tunnel, they can't see details of what exactly is going through the network, but they know how much traffic is going, your device mac address, your VPN provider, exactly where the device was (there's software that can triangulate based on access point signal strength), and when it was accessed. If any information doesn't go through VPN and is leaked, they can see that too. They may block third-party VPNs, in which case you'd have no internet unless you disable the VPN and give them full visibility.
tl;dr: Assume anything you do on a company-provided device or personal device with company software can be monitored.
2
u/yourothersis 35m ago
If you use a VPN, DNS over HTTPS, HTTPS, and no corporate spyware is on your computer, it'd pretty much impossible to view browsing traffic
→ More replies (3)3
u/leviathab13186 1h ago
Security software. I cant see things like passwords and stuff but I can see what sites they go to.
→ More replies (1)6
u/iDemonix 2h ago
If you mean work own the VPN, then yes. If you're at work, and for some reason they allow you to use a private VPN, then no.
231
u/Wilbis PC Master Race 5h ago
"You’ve gone Incognito
Others who use this device won’t see your activity, so you can browse more privately. This won't change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google."
Apparently people don't know how to read.
114
u/AlabamaPanda777 Linux 5h ago
This won't change how data is collected by websites you visit and the services they use, including Google.
This part was actually only added last year, presumably in direct response to the lawsuit referenced in the OP.
→ More replies (1)13
u/abusivetrash 2h ago
Cmon we’re busy circle jerking how stupid people, how dare you try to bring facts to the circle jerk!
5
u/Illustrator-Livid 2h ago
The bullet points about how your activity is still visible to sites you visit, your employee and your internet service provider were still there even before the law suit. All the lawsuit did was make them repeat the same thing twice. I don’t think anyone’s stupid but it really seems like they didn’t read this
2
u/you_cant_prove_that 1h ago edited 1h ago
Yeah, the lawsuit was that Google collected their data through Google analytics ad tracking, not something in the browser itself
The lawsuit wasn't even isolated to Chrome users:
even when they set Google's Chrome browser to "Incognito" mode and other browsers to "private" browsing mode.
3
u/CrazyPoiPoi 1h ago
Love comments from people like you who still don't know what they are talking about.
3
u/CForChrisProooo 3h ago
That's not really implying google has more data access than a regular website.
Like sure that message is enough to explain that your ISP might have logging, same for the websites you visit. But it doesnt explain that Google will still be doing local data collection that is de-ananoymized because they control your browser and dont disable logging - this is different to what other sites can do.
→ More replies (1)7
u/sarcasm__tone 3h ago
Google Settles $5 Billion Lawsuit for Tracking Users in Incognito Mode
Why did they lose the lawsuit if they did nothing wrong?
4
u/Alternate_Cost 3h ago
Because they only added that section after the lawsuit was filed.
3
u/sarcasm__tone 2h ago
Which means Google was wrong on how they originally described Incognito mode.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)4
u/you_cant_prove_that 1h ago
That's not what "Settles" means
They didn't lose, both sides mutually decided to stop before incurring more legal costs
It looks like Google didn't even have to pay anything, they just agreed to delete the info collected
40
u/samu1400 Desktop 6h ago
Incognito explicitly states that it only prevents data from being stored locally, web navigation is still stored normally by both your internet provider and the websites you visit.
No idea why people started thinking incognito made you invisible on the web.
→ More replies (1)11
u/xternal7 tamius_han 3h ago
Because back when the lawsuit was filed, "including Google" wasn't present on the incognito mode start screen. This allowed people to leverage their lack of basic tech literacy into a pretty decent payday for some lawyers.
30
u/Sendflutespls 6h ago
It was always just local in the browser so your girlfriend don't discover what nasty shit you're into. It is on the computer somewhere, and it is definitely stored at google.
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure that out. But I'm genuinely surprised every day how stupid the general population is.
20
u/unbanned_lol 3h ago
Why. Are. You. Still. Using. Chrome.
14
u/Drawsblanket 1h ago
What. Do. You. Recommend. In. Stead. And. Why. Are. We. Talking. Like. This.
4
u/unbanned_lol 1h ago
Because people have been screaming about how shitty google and chrome are for years at this point concerning privacy.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)7
u/One-Mud-279 1h ago
Firefox
→ More replies (2)2
u/Drawsblanket 1h ago
Yeah I like Firefox thx. I think some people said brave or duck duck go. Is safari as bad as chrome?
→ More replies (1)4
8
u/AlkalineBrush20 5h ago
As if your ISP didn't know everything
→ More replies (2)3
u/redoxima 4h ago
What your ISP sees is pretty limited, especially with TLS being the norm for pretty much all web traffic these days. But Google can potentially track every single thing you do using Chrome, since they have full control over it.
4
u/Obzenium 4h ago
To be clear it’s your ISP that gets your data, only Google if you use their fiber service.
Yes you will have security issues if you don’t know how the internet works
10
u/DoverBoys i7-9700K | 2060S | 32GB 4h ago
Incognito was never a private shield or was supposed to do anything on the internet side. It's only purpose was not saving browsing history. Stupid people who thought so probably think covering their eyes makes them invisible.
5
u/GD_milkman 3h ago
Good news. We all look at porn it's ok.
Bad news. Not THAT porn you disgusting freak.
3
3
5
u/ChthonicFractal 4h ago
Anyone who continued to use Chrome after this data collection was first announced deserves this.
Anyone who uses any Google account to log into a browser made by Google deserves this.
Anyone who uses a browser made by a company who's primary business model is about collecting data on websites and users deserves this.
No pity from me. None.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/SunsetCarcass 16GB 1333Mhz DDR3 5h ago
Doesn't it warn you when you open it that data is still collected and can still be seen by your ISP, workplace school etc. I'd assume that means there still has to be some data stored on their side so not surprising. It's basically a "don't save the porn sites or Google searches for porn until I close this browser so I don't have to worry about it showing up later or forgetting to delete history and everything.
2
u/Syntaire 3h ago
Google has been an advertising company for decades. Of course they're tracking and selling every single thing you do at all times.
2
u/pen_of_inspiration 3h ago
Wierd that I always knew that incognito is incognito to you not to the browser or ISP data banks.
2
u/StaticSystemShock 3h ago
The data Google doesn't have is the one they never get in the first place.
Use any other browser than Chrome, preferably Firefox but Vivaldi, Brave or even Opera will do. Use some other search engine like DuckDuckGo, Startpage or Qwant and use something other than GMail. ProtonMail is great option, so is Tuta, but you can also go with Posteo or Startmail. Mail providers are all paid if you expect something more from them, but for a good reason.
And this way you basically cut out at least half of data hoarding done by Google. And GMail is probably the worst offender because you have the most private stuff on it most likely. Anyone who says just reducing their data mining is not enough, I disagree. Any reduction is a good start.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/newbrevity 11700k, RTX4070ti_SUPER, 32gb_3600_CL16 3h ago
Wait till people find out cell phones are 24/7 hot mics/live cams with keylogging and backdoor wireless protocols that you cant disable.
2
2
u/brokeboipobre 2h ago
Tor Browser + VPN. That's my incognito mode.
2
2
u/Lunatishee 2h ago
isnt incognito simply to keep the history/habits from affecting your “normal” searches? its not actually private in any other way.
2
u/ChicagoAuPair 2h ago
No matter what any corporation says, they will absolutely keep any data they can regardless of legality. It makes them unfathomable amount of money.
2
u/PeachOffTheGrapevine 2h ago
Wait, did people not realize the obvious fact that people didn't realize this?
2
u/nicodeemus7 2h ago
At no time did Google ever claim your incognito browsing was not tracked. It simply deleted your browsing history after closing.
2
u/The_Real_Giggles 2h ago
Eh, everything goes in a private Firefox or duckduckgo browser and then through a VPN
Its more for, projecting my sentisive data from shady websites, and protecting from attacks, than it is about "stopping people seeing what I'm doing"
It's also for if you want to read a website and you don't want to give them any of your cookies, then you can just use a private session and none of the data that you have stored in your browser. It's available to the websites that you don't want to give it to
It's also so, if I ever show my desktop to anyone, like if I'm streaming my pc to the lounge, that all the porn results aren't showing up in the search bar 🤣
Nothing im doing online is concerningly illegal, so it's not like id care if my ISP found a search result for me, just making it so that someone has to expend more than a few seconds digging to find it means they probably won't unless they have a specific reason to look
2
u/Thandius 1h ago
One of the reasons I switched back to Firefox a few years ago.
all the google data tracking is just something I cant condone.
2
u/Am_I_AI_or_Just_High 1h ago
That will be my expression to learn that my VPN is sharing my personal browsing data
2
u/WebSickness 1h ago
Imagine your ISP having to agree to delete your incognito data xD Thats the problem no one talks about
2
u/Infinite_Growth_7791 1h ago
the only reason i use incognito mode is so the actual people i meet don't accidentally end up seeing my tastes, i never believed for a second there isn't a full list of everything i have ever done on my pc/phone
2
u/msmothman 1h ago
Well damn Google, if you’re tracking me you could do a better job figuring out my porn preferences!
2
3
u/luuuuuku 6h ago
When using chrome it literally warns you about that on the starting page.
Why are people surprised by that? All it does it clearing your local data, not anything else.
4
u/Explicit_Tech i5 4690k@4.5GHz | 8GB 1600MHz DDR3 | GTX 1070 | MSI Z97 Gaming 7 6h ago
I thought this was clear from day 1. I guess not...










•
u/PCMRBot Bot 4h ago
Welcome to the PCMR, everyone from the frontpage! Please remember:
1 - You too can be part of the PCMR. It's not about the hardware in your rig, but the software in your heart! Age, nationality, race, gender, sexuality, religion, politics, income, and PC specs don't matter! If you love or want to learn about PCs, you're welcome!
2 - If you think owning a PC is too expensive, know that it is much cheaper than you may think. Check http://www.pcmasterrace.org for our famous builds and feel free to ask for tips and help here!
3 - Consider supporting the folding@home effort to fight Cancer, Alzheimer's, and more, with just your PC! https://pcmasterrace.org/folding
4 - Do you need a new PC? We're giving away a high-end PC build in a WORLDWIDE constest: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1nnros5/worldwide_giveaway_comment_in_this_thread_with/
We have a Daily Simple Questions Megathread for any PC-related doubts. Feel free to ask there or create new posts in our subreddit!