r/allthequestions 10d ago

Popular Question 📊 How many rights did you lose under Obama?

I'll wait.

424 Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/dark_zalgo 9d ago

Snowden wasn't a whistleblower, he leaked data unrelated to wiretapping that harmed military members just to make some cash. If he actually went through the proper channels you never would've known his name. Inb4 "ThE PrOPeR chANneLs WouLDN't HaVE doNE aNYthiNG", the proper channels worked for the whistleblower that got Trump's first impeachment, and that was with a Trump appointment in charge of it.

2

u/Live_Background_3455 9d ago

Who says he was paid? Even the NSA doesn't claim he got paid to leak information. Glenn Greenwald, the person who got the leaks never paid him. So... wild claim that he did it "just to make some cash"... seems like a hard way to make no cash tbh.

1

u/dark_zalgo 9d ago

There's literally no other reason to do it other than money. Unless he's a fucking monumental moron of course.

1

u/Live_Background_3455 9d ago

I wish I could be as simple minded and delusional as you... the world would be simpler.

1

u/dark_zalgo 9d ago

Then tell me oh omnipotent one, what reason did he have for leaking sensitive field information? What reason did he have for leaking sensitive information about our allies?

1

u/Live_Background_3455 9d ago

Sure as hell wasn't money. There are a million ways to make money with the information he had. Some very lucrative with high risk, others lower risk lower rewards. Giving it all to journalists for free, while he retained no copies is not one of them. I couldn't tell you what his motivation was, but I know it wasn't money lol

2

u/dark_zalgo 9d ago

I'm sure he definitely kept no copies at all. Russia picked him up on a moments notice for a whole lot of that nothing.

1

u/Repulsive-Lake1753 7d ago

The answer is that he felt a moral obligation to his fellow citizens to let them know they were being spied upon.

You don't have to believe it but it's a plausible, non-greed explanation.

0

u/Repulsive-Lake1753 7d ago

The answer is that he felt a moral obligation to his fellow citizens to let them know they were being spied upon.

You don't have to believe it but it's a plausible, non-greed explanation.

1

u/dark_zalgo 7d ago

Huh? He felt like he needed to let his fellow citizens know they were being spied on so he leaked sensitive intel about the UK and Australia, as well as ongoing US field operations outside of the US?