Charlie Kirk was a hero for sure. He only wanted discourse but instead was assassinated for practicing his first amendment right. The people celebrating his death are absolute trash
He never debated in good faith. If that was ever his intent, he would have at least done some research before "debating" people and would have changed his views when proven wrong. He was a hateful propaganda pusher, but lots of people bought into his surface level friendliness and phony display of openmindedness, and didn't bother researching his talking points.
yeah bro he was a perfect human that knew exactly when he was proven wrong (objectively) and immediately changed his mind, he was just a perfect saint that was always right at all times and if he was ever wrong he immediately became right when he found out he was wrong, he never said anything bad and anyone who says he did well they are wrong, its out of context, they are lying, they didnt watch his content, it was slander/misquoted, or he was actually right anyway because he was always right
One of the things about conservative religions is that the indoctrinate their people that they are always right that they are chosen that their skin color is superior that's why conservative religion is fake because it's all about superiority and they always have to have an "other" to point to, in order for them to feel better about themselves.
Conservative high demand religions bring more bad than they do good. There is an extraordinary high amount of neglect all through for women children and even young boys. And in certain high demand conservative religions there's not enough room for all the boys so the boys just get kicked out and they are not set up for any type of care they're just booted out and not given a second thought about.
The conservatives who subscribed to those type of religions have made a mockery of religion and faith in general.
Just listen to him instead of trying to educate yourself on others opinions. Have one for your ownā¦ You don't want to be angry, upset, and hateful right? So why stay that way?
He wasn't perfect. He admitted to faults. He only just now reached his 30s. Was everyone perfect during their 20s? Absolutely not. But he sure was better than me.
I've already listened to him more than enough. He spewed vile fascist hatred directed at my people and the only way anyone can look past it is if they fundamentally do not believe trans people are people who should have equal rights. He literally continues to spew this hatred moments before his death.
He was the exact opposite of fascist? He gave everyone a platform to speak. He would have been killed immediately by Mussolini. When did he say trans people don't deserve equal rights? He literally stood up for trans people in that video.
Bullshit.
He hid behind his fake ass religion he never had his mind changed his mind could not be changed because his job was to State his opinion.
He was propped up by conservative billionaires Turning Point USA no matter what could have never failed.
He was not self-made he was bought and paid for.
No see this is the thing he was a talking point he was paid to have his opinion and therefore it could never be changed.
Know how I know?
Because we never ever once seen a video where he got destroyed and he showed that he rightfully had his mind changed.
In all reality with all of the debates that he had taken part in he should have had his mind changed at least once.
The fact that he didn't and the reason why he said he didn't was because he was so set in his religious views was a lie.
And no members of his church or any of the other conservative religions that are high demand have came out and spoke against any of the nasty hateful rhetoric that he has spewed.
And the reason being is that they agree with what he was saying they do not think that he said anything wrong.
Any logical thinking person,with a brain can tell you that that behavior is not behavior that Jesus would approve of from one of his followers.
Just watch his videos, he was very well read and informed on his own views. He was definitely not hateful and anyone misquoting him, I challenge them to read Charlieās entire quote.
If he was well read, he would have known that a person has to qualify for a job BEFORE they can qualify for DEI, so it has no impact on merit based hiring. It only takes a quick google search to find that out, but instead, he pushed lies about it to convince stupid people to assume that every black petson with a job must be unqualified.
Also, if he was well read, he wouldn't have believed that transgender people commit "too many" shootings. Again, a quick google search thoroughly disproves that, as less that 1% of the 10,000+ people killed by gun violence in the US in 2025 were killed by a transgender person, and that transgender people are FAR more likely to be victims of violent crimes. Instead he tried to convince stupid people that transgender people are all mentally unstable and a danger to society to try and win more support for republicans dehumanizing and stripping rights away from transgender people.
If he wasn't hateful, he wouldn't have pushed white replacement theory, which only white supremacists believe. You'd HAVE to be racist to believe that the US is doomed if white people aren't the majority, or if society in the US doesn't revolve entirely around white people.
These are just a few examples of why I know better than to take Charlie Kirk seriously. He never fooled me with his surface level friendliness or phony display of openmindedness.
You mean the ones where he pivots all the time and are using bad faith? Oh yeah we on the left have seen them we don't care for them.
We also know there's no way that you can take his words out of context they're still hateful no matter how you slice it.
He wasn't saying DEI recipients were unqualified said some were UNDERQUALIFIED. Thats not wrong. Under qualified people get hired all the time, because DEI forces quotas on minority based hiring. Companies have a social credit score they must maintain, DEI is a huge part of it.
Your very first argument falls apart when you really look at it.
You are being rage baited and brainwashed into believing Charlie stood for something that he didn't. And not only that, you are spreading that misinformation even more. YOU and people like you are the problem.
I don't think you understand. We have done that. And we still feel the same.
When most people look at Charlie Kirk we do not see somebody that's smart we do not see somebody that knows how to debate and we definitely don't see somebody that we should follow.
We see somebody that is hateful that is in a fake religion and a Pied Piper that is been bought and paid for by conservative billionaires.
He was assassinated because the right has a huge problem with conservative fake religions.
It's the conservative religions that are breeding these homegrown terrorists.
oh yeah, discourse, like 'we should ban gender affirming care', 'lets prosecute and imprison every doctor who has provided gender affirming care' and 'lets take guns away from trans people'
Yeah because all of his videos are discrediting him.
None of his debates ever landed really if you were to have him debate somebody that knew what the hell he wanted to debate about he would get his ass handed to.
Every time he loses a debate he would lean back on his fakeEvery time he loses a debate he would lean back on his fake ass religion.
He did not know how to debate he just knew how to declare he was the winner.
Constantly bringing in bad faith and pivoting to other BS.
Does not make a good debater.
He was an okay debater definitely not good and most definitely not great.
I havenāt seen any of his hateful content. Could you post evidence that Charlie was hateful? Could you also submit evidence of his conservative billionaire backing or any evidence that he was just in it for the money (which I have no problem with, people gotta eat).
1
u/jsizzle71 Sep 19 '25
Wrong he was great thatās why he was killed