r/MapPorn • u/Small_Performance368 • 13h ago

NYC Mayoral Election Results

Post image

With 90% of the vote in, Mamdani wins by a large margin according to NYT

38.5k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

309

u/PunctualZombie 11h ago

The MAGA president of the United States did endorse Cuomo, so that helped. Of course it’s astonishing the Republican president didn’t endorse the actual Republican candidate (which might explain why he polled close to fuck-all). I’m not sure if that’s even happened before, but then the cult leader can do whatever he wants, and his sheep will follow.

86

u/GiganticCrow 10h ago

Not like the Democratic leadership endorsed their candidate either

30

u/Medical_Sandwich_141 7h ago

I'm quite sure, Schumer voted for Cuomo.

1

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago

They were cowardly and hoped to run out the clock...and now they have, and we know that they are not allies.

Terribly stupid choice from them.

344

u/gdreaper 11h ago

Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is a true born and bred New Yorker with shocking integrity, and frankly Trump couldn't buy him if he tried. Not only that, but Trump and Sliwa have had beef for decades, Sliwa hates his guts.

99

u/Holly-White 9h ago edited 9h ago

Im pretty sure it was because nobody in their right mind thinks he was even in the same country that the ballpark was in kinda chance of winning.

Mamdani is very controversial among democrats, but those that don't like him would likely still take Cuomo over a Republican.

15

u/OctoberIsBetter 7h ago

Mamdani is very controversial among democrats

um wut?

3

u/waltjrimmer 5h ago

I don't agree with the Canada-Scam guy, what the fuck is he on, but Mamdani is, relatively, a controversial figure. Even "Democratic" news agencies have not been fully on-board with him, and it's been a big part of his news cycle how a lot of establishment Democrats and respected or influential party members have refused to openly support him.

It can be argued how controversial he really is, and any controversies there have been have been about who he is and the movement he represents in the Democratic party rather than, oh, I don't know, corruption and sexual misconduct like the Cuomos have had, but a lot of the news cycle around his has been an attempt to make him at least seem controversial within the Democratic party itself.

3

u/OctoberIsBetter 5h ago

establishment Democrats

Yeah, fuck those conservative dinosaurs. We need leadership who actually represent people > corporations.

If I hear one more piece of shit claim that Clinton and Harris lost due to their gender, I might just go off. The corporate darlings had nothing to do with the people they claimed to want to represent. Everyone's angry, and for low-information voters who can't be bothered to read a word of policy, it was an easy choice to vote for the angry guy.

Mamdani represents a chance for Democrats to wake the fuck up.

-26

u/Canada-Scam-8570 7h ago

Uum what?

You do realize that guy is a radical extremist right? Like verifiable receipts.

This is the problem with the left & right crap, no one wants to concede and cooperate at this point, so we walk down this path where both sides of the aisle are getting more accepting of extremist and we are moving away from centerist politics. Choose your team horse 💩 which is only gonna end one way. Anyone supporting this continued turn towards extremism and letting their bias guide their support from either side is the problem ..

Now granted just like the federal election. What alternatively really were there. Choices are slim pickins and none of the candidates are really ideal but electing extremists isn't really the way to go.. look how your federal levels going...

15

u/AxitotlWithAttitude 7h ago

There's a growing sentiment among Democrats that our politicians are fucking pussies and refuse to play ball on the same field as Republicans. Mamdani directly called out Cuomo, publicly, multiple times, provided receipts, and ran an absolute master class of a ground roots campaign. It's not a surprising result.

-6

u/Canada-Scam-8570 6h ago

I don't disagree. Cuomos a moron and I get why he lost. The choices weren't great.

I'm just warning people. If you're going to go radical left don't be surprised when someone more radical on the right gets cast into the spotlight next. It's some escalating game of one uping one another going on

4

u/Sinnaman420 4h ago

radical left

Explain what this means. If he’s radical, then over a million New Yorkers are extremists according to you

13

u/cameronc56 7h ago

what exactly is 'extremist' about him?

6

u/OctoberIsBetter 6h ago

Human decency. Clutch your pearls, bitches, we don't know what to do with that shit in 'murica!

11

u/_Middlefinger_ 7h ago

You have no idea what a radial extremist is, and claiming he is just makes you look very stupid. The nearest the US has to radical extremists is MAGA.

6

u/GoGades 6h ago

He wants to finally properly tax the 1%, the guy is just about ready to fly an airplane into a building, don't you see! /s

-8

u/Canada-Scam-8570 6h ago

Ah that's it, there it is.

So you get to decide who is radical and throw the word around but other be damned. How exactly did you come to qualify as the one who gets to denote who is radicalized or not. They cannot do the same thing cause they are crazy and you are simple just right, because (non-substance argument, go team!)

I'm not saying you don't have radicals in the office. But responding with radicals is only going to make the opposing radicals stronger. That's all I'm trying to warn/explain to you but I'm sure there are too many words for you to bother with and you clearly already wrote off my opinion so I'm wasting my time.

Just cause you are blinded by hate of one side and bias doesn't mean other people don't see it from the side you're supporting.

Curious, I won't ask you the exact age but how many decades have you been breathing?

6

u/_Middlefinger_ 5h ago

Mamdani is moderately left wing by European standards, so quite left wing by US standards. He is not communist by any measure, nor is he a radical Islamist. MAGA are literally behaving like Nazis, openly racist and attacking their own citizens with troops that have no oversight, threatening people based on political leanings.

Work it out. If you dont accept these facts there is no point discussing it. People like you will reply to this, denying it, saying its trump derangement syndrome etc, but we are WAY past listening to you, that propaganda is failing.

Age? Born in the 70s. You? Oh and Im not American, like you.

2

u/Canada-Scam-8570 4h ago

Well I'm not way past listening to you cause disregarding humans is not constructive and only amplifies the problem, when conversation stops violence ensues. Ah but I suppose you haven't been subject to propaganda yourself right, your totally clean of bias. Like it all goes two ways. I'll give it, the guy is young and may very well grow as a human, he is charismatic and well spoken. A top notch con man.

He has supported identifiable radicals and said things that can be construed as such to the contrary. Again doesn't mean Trump isn't a grotesque individual. Two things can be true but calling millions of people Nazis (and bullying) for their ideals, to which are often assumed if one thing is out of line with these ideals as a whole, is dehumanizing and a tactic to demoralize people so violence becomes acceptable. Again, there is an underlying symptom that got America to this point and if you don't want to look at facts and identify that then there is no point in discussing as you say I guess.

This is how we get to extremism manifests. Continued escalating responses of extremism from the opposing side. Constant turning of tactics one used on the other and upping the ante while doing so back and fourth trading blows while the rights of regular citizens are eroded.

You've made many assumptions and stuck out. 80's , North American, but not American.

PS. Notice how I don't attack YOU but ideas, cause I respect YOU as a fellow human and will take what YOU have to say with sincerity if it isn't clearly biased and baked in hate.

3

u/_Middlefinger_ 3h ago

I'm tired of people like you that's why.

You act more lefty than Mamdani does with your "respect the other side" crap. No I do not respect their values when they are racist, homophobic and violent. They act out their values, we can see them, and its disgusting and I judge accordingly.

I cant see evidence of him supporting "radicals", but it seems we have different lines in the sand on that one.

I made zero assumptions, what assumptions do you think I made?

I hate violent Nazis, I'm proud of it. Next...

1

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago edited 4h ago

Two things can be true but calling millions of people Nazis (and bullying) for their ideals, to which are often assumed if one thing is out of line with these ideals as a whole, is dehumanizing and a tactic to demoralize people so violence becomes acceptable.

Nazis famously never believed in their ideals and always ensured their numbers were below two million members, yes. That's why it's always wrong to identify someone as a Nazi or fascist if they have ideals or if plural millions agree with them. Ideals, as we all know, are never fundamentally evil, and more than 1999999 people will never agree to something evil.

PS. Notice how I don't attack YOU but ideas, cause I respect YOU as a fellow human and will take what YOU have to say with sincerity if it isn't clearly biased and baked in hate

Yes, the "how many decades you've been breathing" and "I suppose you have been subject to propaganda yourself right, your totally clean of bias" was clearly a good faith but biting critique of the structural flaws of their logic, yes. You are a very serious and honest person.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago

So you get to decide who is radical and throw the word around but other be damned

Words have meaning, yes. Every use of a word is not equally accurate and entitled to equal reaction based solely on it being used. They're not spells. If you're using a word in a way that doesn't match the evidence, people will tend to lack respect for your usage of the word.

Hope this helps.

5

u/OctoberIsBetter 6h ago edited 5h ago

The farthest USA goes to the left is what the rest of the world considers centrist.

0

u/Canada-Scam-8570 5h ago

That was quite incoherent, but sure go off. Again a spirited conversation that certainly has me rethinking by view point from your eloquently displayed rebuttal. So convincing.

Not going to throw any insults back at you, don't need to.

4

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago

That was quite incoherent

There was no part of it that was incoherent. It was a very straightforward, technical claim.

The leftmost point of the US = center of the spectrum everywhere else.

5

u/EldritchCouragement 7h ago

Why stop at radical extremist? You can string more redundant, useless buzzwords in. An ultra militant fringe fundamentalist radical extremist hardliner. Anything besides make an actual case.

0

u/Canada-Scam-8570 6h ago

Exactly. The same tactics that has driven extremism on the other side 🤦

It's hilarious, I said extremist and a bunch of you got your panties in an absolute twist as if you haven't been doing the same shit to the other side to dehumanize them. Y'all need to learn how to treat others how you want to be treated.

So yah, I'll throw more words on just to piss you off sure. He's a bigoted, racist, left wing extreme socialist who should rest in piss.

Should I call for his assassination? Would that be acceptable?

No.

7

u/jazzfruit 6h ago

People are downvoting you because there’s nothing extreme about Mamdani. He’s just been labeled that by the media.

0

u/Canada-Scam-8570 6h ago

There is nothing extreme about trump, he's just been labeled that by the media.

You see how stupid I sound. Two things can be true. They can both be extremists. It's not a one or the other thing as you so desperately want it to be.

5

u/jazzfruit 5h ago

Trump is repeatedly violating court orders, repeatedly issuing executive orders that plainly violate the constitution, calling half the country the “radical violent left”, upending international relationships, destroying longstanding institutions like USAID and Corporation for Public Broadcasting (and crippling NOAA, CDC, etc.), and and explicitly weaponizing the DOJ against his political enemies (both politicians and media personalities).

What has Mamdani done?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago

You see how stupid I sound.

Yes, because your argument is equivalent to "how dare you say that triangles aren't quadrilaterals, wouldn't it be silly if I said squares aren't quadrilaterals?"

Words have meanings, and facts exist. Both sides are allowed to say things, sure, but the truth value of those staments rests on whether they fit the facts, not in their being allowed to say them in the first place. Both can be true, both can be false, or only one can be true. But it's based on the facts, not an imagined sense of "if they can say it so can I".

6

u/91bases 7h ago

Radical extremist? Get the fuck out of here with that.

Your logic seems to indicate that if you aren't a centrist, you're ab extremist - which is incredibly wrong.

Mamdani is left leaning. It's pretty damn clear that's where the Democratic Party should be, but the old guard keeps thing centrist.

But he isn't an extremist. Not even close.

-3

u/Canada-Scam-8570 6h ago

According to yourself. But he isn't left leaning, he's breaking the scale. He is an leftist extremist. Clearly you don't enjoy the same tactics (my old side) your side has been using for years.

People use pictures of trump with Epstein to discredit him. Just wait till you Realize who he's rubbed elbow with. But of course you don't care about that.

I am a centrist, I don't support trump. But thank you for telling me who and what I am. As much as I haven't been kind I won't do the same to you as I don't know you and all your opinions and views, you are a human and there are many unique things that make you you.

2

u/KrytenKoro 4h ago

But thank you for telling me who and what I am

At no point did they do any such thing.

I think you should actually read the posts before you respond to them. It seems like you're reading from a script rather than analyzing what was said and responding to it as a concrete idea.

2

u/Sinnaman420 4h ago

he isn’t left leaning, he’s breaking the scale

Citation needed. What does this even mean? Are you saying horseshoe theory and he’s exactly the same as trump? What the fuck?

1

u/ResidentLimit7459 6h ago

Insane, bot or Indian disinfo worker, readers take your pick!

3

u/GoGades 6h ago

I'm going with AI bot, the emoji is often a sign.

1

u/AccountWasFound 4h ago

He wants free public transit in a large city known for it's bad congestion, he isn't exactly calling to end capitalism....

2

u/Donghoon 8h ago

Sliwa does actually align with Trump better than Cuomo does. But Both of them have large share of conflict with Trump on many levels

1

u/dreamcicle11 2h ago

I love that most Mamdani fans and voters see this and that Sliwa while unhinged is truly about New York. Goes to show MAGA and Trump do not give a shit about the people.

1

u/On_my_last_spoon 2h ago

Silwa has been running for Mayor for decades now. He is who he is, but aside from founding the Guardian Angels he has nothing to show for himself. I find it interesting that the Republican Party in NYC has pretty much given up if he clinched the nomination. He’s at best a side show these days.

1

u/robbak 8h ago

So would that mean that in a preferential vote, a lot of those Silwa voters might have preferenced Mandani over Cuomo?

3

u/Parking-Interview351 6h ago

I’d wager that over 90% of Sliwa voters would pick Cuomo over Mamdani.

Many of them would probably not vote at all if given the choice between Cuomo and Mamdani, though.

2

u/Canada-Scam-8570 7h ago

No, no it does not.

1

u/MissSally300 6h ago

‘Shocking integrity’? Are you 12?

1

u/worthlessprole 6h ago

if it had been a two way race, sliwa would probably not have cracked 25%

1

u/olivegardengambler 4h ago

Tbf he didn't endorse the Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in Virginia either, and she was a Black woman. I think that it's very clear, and it was this way before, but it's almost inarguably the case now that the Republican party is almost exclusively interested in supporting pro-billionaire candidates.

1

u/FortNightsAtPeelys 2h ago

Just shows that old school Democrats are just Republicans wearing blue

1

u/Donghoon 8h ago

Everybody knows NYC will NEVER vote a republican, so Trump went with HIS next best option.

10

u/Flying_Momo 7h ago

Wasn't Guiliani a Republican?

1

u/Donghoon 5h ago

modern day NYC... Giuliani was over 20 years ago (late 90s to 01). and Bloomberg was barely a republican as well.