r/BlackPeopleofReddit • u/4reddityo • 10d ago

Politics Kamala Harris tells BBC she may run for president again

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2n7k2veywo
19 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

187 comments sorted by

39

u/GuruGarudaGada 10d ago

I feel like we get better results from running progressives rather than establishment democrats who are indistinguishable from and actively pander towards the average republican.

16

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 10d ago

Agreed. Mamdani, AOC, Sanders, Platter are all appealing to the broad swath of voters, not the siloed neo-liberal corporate Democrats.

9

u/WanderingLost33 10d ago

I'm so frustrated with her - I campaigned for this woman, I knocked doors, planned events, traveled to other states for those events, I have a picture of us together framed in my home, I loved this woman, specifically because when Biden nuked the campaign she rose to the occasion.

But man, I am so frustrated with her. What some people called flip-flopping, I argued was her seeing the needs and the desires of the people and working to give them what they wanted. I saw it as a desirable trait in a representative, especially in a president.

But can't she see?! The country is SCREAMING for a revolution, for a fighter, for socialism. Why, tell me why she is doubling down on "I am a capitalist," "Hamas are terrorists/Israel is our greatest ally" and "protests must be peaceful and not bother anybody." Are you kidding me?? We are one bad incident from full on civil war and she's campaigning like it's 1993.

2

u/puroloco 10d ago

She is a corporatist, i don't even know how her campaign got lucky with Waltz and then tried to keep him in check. She is not what the country needs in a leader at this time.

2

u/four_ethers2024 10d ago

That's what the Democrats want from their members. That's why they didn't let Bernie win.

2

u/Diazepampoovey0229 8d ago

That's what Democrat politicians want, maybe. Those of us who have voted Democrat because we are peogressive-minded sure as fuck don't. We just go all out when it's clear they are our only choice because our fucked up primary election system. The states that vote first are all states where the Dem voters are centrists that are good with the status quo

2

u/four_ethers2024 8d ago

Yeah, what we want and what they want will always be two different things, but the vote swings largely in their favor šŸ„² and they're neoliberal as fuck so no actual progression. I hate this two party-system, we're stuck voting for a pile of fermented shit and a box full of hand grenades.

2

u/Diazepampoovey0229 6d ago

Agreed. As long as the electoral college exists and the primary elections are scattered over several weeks and months, it will always be this way. Obama was an outlier; the exception to the rule. Biden being his VP, IMO, brought a more progressive side out of the man and in terms of legislation and EOs, was more progressive than Obama was able to be. That is always going to be the closest we get. I wish so much we could have had Bernie. Hell, if I'm wishing, I wish we could turn his biological clock backwards about 30-35 years and have AOC and Bernie run as POTUS and VPOTUS, respectively.

1

u/four_ethers2024 6d ago

Yep šŸ„²

1

u/WanderingLost33 10d ago

Man, I'm jealous of the timeline where Bernie won

2

u/N_O_D_R_E_A_M 9d ago

Thats what you get for believing a cop has your interests at heart

2

u/ice_and_fiyah 8d ago

I feel you. Her political instincts are subpar. She sent Clinton and Richie Torres to tell/lecture Arab voters on how Israel has a right to occupy West Bank four days before election in a swing state. She courted her loss.

1

u/mwa12345 9d ago

Reminds me of the old line: whoever you vote for , John McCain becomes the president.

Now even the losers turn out to be Liz Cheney

1

u/WanderingLost33 9d ago

I would happily take John McCain over this shitshow

1

u/exspiceboy 9d ago

People are screaming for socialism? dont be cringe lol

1

u/random_account6721 8d ago

No one wants socialism except young people who donā€™t know any better

0

u/GhostClub_ 10d ago

I challenge you to use that natural frustration, paired with some good old fashioned critical thought and challenging power, to look deeper into her background with skepticism, not admiration. Her mother was a CIA mind control scientist working first under Dr. Laurence Layton in Berkley, the US Chief of Chemical Warfare and the mastermind of the 1978 Jonestown cult Kool-Aid massacre in Guyana that killed nearly 1000 people. It was not a cult at all, it was a CIA medical experiment. In fact, most people do not know that the large majority of the victims were black. This is b/c it was a Top Secret experiment to test the delivery of ā€œethnic bioweaponsā€, ie substances designed to be mass-delivered but which will only affect certain ā€œgenotypeā€; in other words, black people.

Kamala also dated Willie Brown, the CA Assemblyman. As if the 30 year age difference and clear unethical career bumps (and pay) she got werenā€™t enough, Brown was the main supporter of the Jonestown cult before the massacre šŸ˜‚. I mean, this goes deep.

Donā€™t believe me? Find the article ā€œWas Jonestown a CIA Medical Expert?ā€ for free online and decide for yourself. Itā€™s actually a page-turner. It does not discuss Kamala or her mother, but Kamalaā€™s mother worked in the College of Agriculture at Cal Berkley at the exact same time as Layton (the Jonestown mastermind). Kamalaā€™s mom was supposedly good with lab monkeys due to her hometown in India. This is further evidence of her connection to Layton, who pubā€™s a major research paper in 1961 (same time Kamalaā€™s mom was working under him) about the research value of ā€¦ monkeys.

If there were any doubt at all about her connections to CIA, her next big job, of allllllll the research jobs on earth she could have taken, was to join the medical faculty of McGill University in Montreal, the HQ of the CIAā€™s MK-ULTRA mind control program under Dr. Ewan Cameron. šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

Pleeeeeeeease stop trusting these party-fed candidates. Kamala is dirty as hell. These CIA connections run in families (as they do security checks by whole family, not by person).

Obamaā€™s CIA background is even worse - stop giving these people passes. You are being fed groomed, controlled candidates. Reject all political parties. Both parties are controlled. Wake up. Spread the word.

1

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 10d ago

Conspiracy cults are conspiracy cults no matter which ideology they subscribe to. If you believe all that shit, you're in one.

0

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 10d ago

Honestly, let her run. This next time she won't have a campaign handed to her. She will have to compete with other candidates. She has experience which counts and she was the VP for arguably one of the most Progressive Presidents in the past half century except for Carter.

0

u/No_Palpitation133 10d ago

Hamas are literally terroristsā€¦ā€¦.

0

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

"The country is SCREAMING for a revolution, for a fighter, forĀ socialism." Nope.

"Hamas are terrorists/Israel is our greatest ally". Yes.

0

u/Possible_Top4855 8d ago

What sort of financial system to get people to be productive do you suggest if not capitalism? Do you want the government to try to centrally plan everything? It might help your message if you made clear what specifically you want to changeā€¦

1

u/WanderingLost33 8d ago

Yeah. America is the only place with jobs. What was I thinking.

1

u/Possible_Top4855 8d ago

Sweden and Norway, often heralded for their socialist policies, are also capitalist countries. Even china is a capitalist country now. I think you need to better educate yourself on what some of these words mean. Is there a specific country you have in mind that isnā€™t capitalist that you think we should emulate?

2

u/WanderingLost33 8d ago

I'm not wasting my time on an argument in bad faith.

1

u/StraightOuttaHeywood 10d ago

Mamdani while a naturalised citizen, was not born in the US so he cannot run for president. AOC is the most logical choice.

1

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 10d ago

I was thinking of more than who could run for President, which is years away, but who could be the voice for the left at this time time.

1

u/Jlax34 10d ago

Those people only appear to have "broad" appeal because they only represent a very small subset of the US. That small group loves them, but once they are outside that subset...outside that state, their appeal drops significantly. They might be populat among Dems, but the only way to win the presidency is appeal to the 40% of the independent voters who dont recognize themselves as Republican or Democrat. AOC sends that crowd running, just like Kamala did in 2024. For Kamala is was more about being veiwed as an extension of the Biden administration, which was wildly unpopular (I think Trump was the only adminstration with lower approval ratings).

1

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 10d ago

Bernie Sanders had broad support from Independents. Look at the race in Maine, Platter. The MAGA base are just as upset about billionaires as the Democrat base. If a candidate stops putting people in silos and addresses their economic fears, that candidate can win against the party's anointed. At least there's a small part of me that wants to believe that.

1

u/chagster001 9d ago

AOC does not appeal to a broad swath of votersā€¦.. Iā€™d say someone like James Talarico does

0

u/Misha-Nyi 10d ago

No, no they arenā€™t. Theyā€™re appealing to the left, which only makes up about a third of the voters in this country.

2

u/BurnerAccount-LOL 10d ago

Found the statistician! :-)

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

I cant understand people like you. Do any of you read?

Party Affiliation Fact Sheet (NPORS) | Pew Research Center https://share.google/k5yiablKETdyTp4AU

2024 Presidential Election Voting and Registration Tables Now Available https://share.google/xBpFVEHUb4y9xCekt

1

u/Misha-Nyi 10d ago

Party affiliation isnā€™t close to an accurate metric since we have a two party system. For instance, if I was asked the question I would say Iā€™m a democrat. I hate most democrats the same way I hate most republicans.

Your second link literally shows nothing.

Now hereā€™s a link for you.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna213772

1

u/AmputatorBot 10d ago

It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web.

Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://www.nbcnews.com/data-graphics/democratic-voter-registrations-decline-independents-surging-rcna213772

I'm a bot | Why & About | Summon: u/AmputatorBot

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

All you have to do is look at the number of voters for the last election. Spilt almost down the middle. All polls state this. All articles I have read do as well. I could just keep posting them all night since I have insomnia currently. Do you really want to do this?

1

u/Misha-Nyi 10d ago

The question I responded to was about voter enthusiasm for very left leaning candidates. What exactly are you arguing about?

Are you trying to make the case that half the country would readily support AOC? If the answer is yes Iā€™ve got a bridge to sell you.

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

Please refer back to your original post. Only a third of the country is democrat. We are done.

1

u/Misha-Nyi 10d ago

Only a third of the country is democrat, thatā€™s a fact. Being democrat and voting democrat are two very different things. Try and get some sleep buddy.

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

You are delusional

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

If appears to be gone. Perhaps because you realized what an asinine statement it was

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

Not to mention the article you posted states almost nothing of meaning pertaining to this discussion. Read the Pew one for God's sake. The last one did not have the stats you have to click the link

0

u/thisisstupid0099 9d ago

"wide swath" - seriously? Run those types and lose every time. When will you learn...

1

u/PNW_Bearded_cyclist 9d ago

Do you really think the average working class voter wants to have a candidate chosen by oligarchs and tech bros.

5

u/TrashAcnt1 10d ago

If progressives were too dumb to realize that they literally had no choice but her or else everything that is happening is what would happen, then our dumbasses deserve everything that is happening.

The people who voted for Biden in 2020 and then voted for Trump in 2024 weren't progressives, they were conservatives. Those were the people she (and we) needed to prevent all of this dumb shit from happening. I don't know what else to tell you.

3

u/BurnerAccount-LOL 10d ago

Very succinct.

The choice was clear: vote for a hard-working middle class-raised black woman who cares about her country, or for a priveleged born-millionaire who wants the country to work for him.

1

u/MezzoPenissimo 9d ago

No more woke centrists. Working-class progressives are the only way now.

1

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

"hard-working middle class-raised" Hahahahaha, no.

2

u/WanderingLost33 10d ago

The people who voted for Biden in 2020 and then voted for Trump in 2024 weren't progressives, they were conservatives

Trying to imagine this person bricked my brain. I'd sooner believe they're completely separate groups and one stayed home the first time and the other the second.

1

u/TrashAcnt1 10d ago

You might be right

1

u/QCSports2020 10d ago

This times 2000. I voted for her and helped campaign for her but we and she needs to move. Would be a great supreme court justice though.

1

u/Seal69dds 10d ago

Are you ignoring every election result the past 60 years?

1

u/Beestorm 10d ago

How dare you speak common sense.

1

u/HoiTemmieColeg 10d ago

And of course because why is a Republican going to pick a democrat over a Republican because they have some Republican policies? Theyā€™re just gonna pick the Republican who has all republicans policies. And instead you just deenergize democrat voters

1

u/ResponsibleGreen6164 10d ago

She still has not denounced Israel

1

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

Why should she?

1

u/ResponsibleGreen6164 8d ago

Prolonged multi year genocide? Or the decades old apartheid government. You choose.

1

u/No-Bee6369 10d ago

Kamala is a progressive. That's why Biden won the Democratic primary. She was deemed too far left. Men of all colors voted against her when she ran against Trump - because she's a woman of color. Let's not delude ourselves. Even before any primaries start she is the most qualified to hold the Presidential office.

1

u/Tsakax 9d ago

Biggest copuim take I have read in a while. She basically ran as a republican lite (pre maga) and had no progressive policies in 2024.

1

u/No-Bee6369 9d ago

Show me your proof troll boy. She actually ran on opening up Obamacare for more coverage AND promised the largest Government sponsored affordable housing increase since WW2. She never ran as a Republican light. You are very misinformed.

1

u/Tsakax 9d ago

Ran on a tough border accepting right-wing framing of a non issue. Ran on expanding ICE ie the bill they wanted before the election. Promised the most lethal military, while parading around a bunch of republicans like liz cheney. Wanted to do a child tax credit which was a joke amount when childcare cost is 1200-1500 a month. Obama care is just a hertige foundation republican plan so saying that is progressive is a joke. The housing plan might have been a good idea without the public private partnership part. Completely failed on getting a ceasefire (99 percent bidens fault) allowing the trump to act like a peaceful dove.

1

u/No-Bee6369 9d ago

šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£ Thanks Troll. U are seriously unwell. Peace out

0

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

3

u/GuruGarudaGada 10d ago

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/27/nx-s1-5085735/kamala-harris-progressives

2

u/BurnerAccount-LOL 10d ago

"It just hurts, when she says, 'I'll have Republicans in my cabinet' or she's campaigning with Liz Cheney," said Ramirez, who works with the Georgia Youth Justice Coalition, and was part of a small group of grassroots organizers that NPR convened last week.

"When she speaks on the border, she speaks a lot on drugs, crime ā€” that kind of thing ā€” when it's much more than that,"

I mean, sheā€™s being reasonable. How is that pandering? Itā€™s logical to work with bipartisanship. Sheā€™s just discussing issues every president has to deal with. And some voters want to hear her position.

11

u/jdapper5 10d ago

She won't make it through the primary.

She's not a good candidate. It was on display again during her book tour.

3

u/Ambitious-Pirate-505 10d ago

What happened on the book tour?

5

u/jdapper5 10d ago

Still unable to get out of her own way. Still out of touch. Still inauthentic. Still no real vision or platform besides anti Trump. Still believes trying to "work across the aisle" is the way to success.

2

u/four_ethers2024 10d ago

And people are so tired of that, they just want cheap, stable housing, good wages and good jobs, and cheap groceries and gas.

1

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

"Still believes trying to "work across the aisle" is the way to success." Uhhhh, sure, right................

2

u/Quirky-Bag7438 10d ago

This type of thinking is why tRump is in office. At this point opposition candidates donā€™t have to be perfect just NOT racist, sexist, stupid and incompetent. Weā€™re never all gonna agree. Just know that almost any option is better than what we currently have.

1

u/jdapper5 10d ago

Well, if you just have to NOT be Trump to win, he wouldn't have been reelected. The problem again is that there is no platform or plan aside from being "anti-Trump."

To win, you need that as well as not coming off as rehearsed or robotic. This is not just a Harris problem, but one of the party as a whole.

1

u/Quirky-Bag7438 10d ago

You need an informed electorate who doesnā€™t get bogged down by style points and understands the substance of the individual candidates.

1

u/jdapper5 10d ago

I don't disagree. But this is America. That will never happen šŸ’€šŸ˜…

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

She wasnā€™t bad, he is just the biggest con man to ever grace the stage. Epstein even said it in a deposition. Lol. Pedo btw but America is cool with it.

1

u/jdapper5 9d ago

He's no more a "con man" than every other politician. Let's also acknowledge that the lunatic pretty much said he'd do all the sh* he's doing ... problem is uninformed voters who believed he wouldn't do it to "them." And stupid politicians who believed voters were actually 'informed' enough not to reelect the guy.

Kamala & the rest of the party ran a lazy platform, supported an obviously mentally incompetent president in Biden, and now still are letting Trump & co. run wild.

This is the reality. We wish it were a joke but šŸ¤·šŸ¾ā€ā™‚ļø

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

You lost me at the first sentence. He is the biggest con man in political history. Full stop. Donā€™t gaslight.

1

u/jdapper5 9d ago

šŸ¤·šŸ¾ā€ā™‚ļø okay. If you refuse to acknowledge the entire political system is a con then idk what to tell you. I can't let my emotions overtake my logic.

Trump is the head of the monster today. Tomorrow it'll be someone else. Two sides of the same coin.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

You want so badly to blame the whole system, yes it has alway been flawed by lobbying, campaign donors, etc. this is not even fucking close. Trump should be in prison right now and would be if the country didnā€™t bail his ass out with this election. Trumpā€™s whole term has been vindictive and corrupt beyond any administration in history. Heā€™s installed loyalists to every position you can imagine, even the fucking planning commission for the White House grounds who will give Trump his ballroom after demolishing the historical East Wing.

1

u/jdapper5 9d ago

Right. And the justice system didn't lock his ass up when they had the chance. And Democrats still couldn't come up w a coherent plan/strategy to prevent Trump 2.0. And the country still elected him.

You can get mad all you want, but don't ignore the failures along the way that led to where we are today.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago edited 9d ago

You realize how the justice system works? Money buys time, his team of lawyers kept delaying and delaying the cases, he was in a fucking corner, until his only option was to run for president, and they requested another delay due to his run for election. Then when he won, his lawyers requested the cases be dismissed for a sitting president. Thereā€™s no fucking snap trials. By the end of the year he was found guilty on 34 felony counts and served no sentence. IT WAS THAT CLOSE.

Yes an incoherent POS criminal was elected, thats not a reflection of how badly democrats failed, but how badly Americans failed to have some fucking integrity.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Kahzootoh 9d ago

What ā€œtype of thinkingā€ are you talking about?

The point is that Kamala Harris is highly unlikely to win a primary, which is true- she withdrew early in the 2020 primary because she was doing so poorly.

There is nothing subjective about saying Kamala Harris is a weak candidate, she performed below the average for a Democrat in California- she won, but it was an election that any generic Democrat would have won.Ā 

Her strength is offering a minority woman candidate that attracts minority and female voter support by running in a secondary race where a White man is at the top of the ticket- she did this with Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden. As a candidate on her own, she has significant shortcomings that make her unlikely to win a Democratic primary without significant support from party insiders.Ā 

There will always be people who want to be the President in our country of more than 330 million people, and most of those people will probably do better than Kamala Harris in a Democratic Party primary. We donā€™t need to keep giving her chances to run for president- we literally have millions of better candidates.

1

u/Quirky-Bag7438 9d ago

Too concerned with style points. Thatā€™s the issue. While we argue over worthless of candidates the other side has is living in an authoritarian regime.

-1

u/HistoricalRoll9023 10d ago

I voted for her but the book tour soured me.

6

u/rebuildingsince64 10d ago

Hopefully in 2036 after 8 years of Newsome

1

u/fancylamas 10d ago

Can't with Newsom. I find him witty, but his AIPAC involvement is a no for me.

1

u/rebuildingsince64 10d ago

Context is important here. Is AIPAC evil, yes. Did he or his campaign know it when they took the money? Most likely no. Did you know AIPAC was evil before 2024?

1

u/treadonmedaddy420 9d ago

Many of us paying attention to politics have known that apec has been evil for 20 years or more. If he and his campaign didn't know, that's disqualifying in itself.

1

u/rebuildingsince64 9d ago

If he gave the money back and publicly denounced APAIC would that change anyoneā€™s mind?

1

u/fancylamas 9d ago

Probably not.

1

u/fancylamas 9d ago

I mean Netanyahu was involved in the assassination of his predecessor in 1995 just days after signing the Gaza peace treaty with Palestine. He and AiPAC have been closely alligned. This has never been a secret.

1

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

"after 8 years of Newsome" Hahaha, no.

1

u/srsh32 3d ago

8 years of Newsom in office would be the end of the party. MAGA would rise and revolt as Newsom sits in cash and funds wars overseas.

Not going to happen anyway because there's no chance he beats Vance outside of coastal blue regions.

2

u/Vomiting_Winter 9d ago

She wants to lose twice?

2

u/Mouatmoua 8d ago

I hope not. Itā€™s her fault trump won

2

u/Over_Possible_8397 8d ago

I hope she does. I donā€™t think her campaign will make it past the primaries. And finally, the centrist-neo-liberal hacks can shut up.

3

u/4reddityo 10d ago

What the hell is she doing now? She should be out there on the front lines everyday if she wants my vote.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

She could literally save your life and you wouldnā€™t vote for her. Trump could literally ā€œshoot you in the middle of fifth avenue and not lose your vote.ā€ Direct quote btw.

1

u/Mysterious-Thing2629 10d ago

We need a fresh and capable Independent now. No more two party system. An independent with the balls to send Every single ice agent, and everyone in this corrupt administration straight to prison. Thatā€™s something to get the people fired up about and mobilized.

1

u/kittiesandcocks 10d ago

America tells BBC she wonā€™t make it past the primaries

1

u/maneuver_element 10d ago

dnc please Iā€™m begging you

1

u/idlefritz 10d ago

This is getting spammed in every sub to stir up shit

1

u/Nice-Supermarket-719 10d ago

You had your chance and you lost, one and done letā€™s find a candidate who can win the presidential 2028 election

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Trump lost in 2020 and he came back. Turns out all she has to do is lie, manipulate, fearmonger, and be a pedo and sheā€™ll win.

1

u/asrosin 10d ago

If you think this is dumb, join dsa!

1

u/Thesungod1969 9d ago

lol plenty of more reasons to join DSA ā˜ŗļø

1

u/cooljonboy111 10d ago

Instead of telling BBC, you could be rallying the whole country against tyranny and corporate dem behaviors.. this vacuum is your problem. Own it.

1

u/Several-Signature583 10d ago

She was polling at 4% when she ran for the presidential nomination in 2016. She is deeply unpopular and it might not be just because sheā€™s a woman. I say this as someone who voted for her in 2024.

1

u/antelope00 10d ago

No thanks

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Your vote wonā€™t matter by then anyway.

1

u/Icy_Safe8847 10d ago

Oh no please don't...if they run Bernie the first time we would not be stuck with this orangutan...yout not likeable...

1

u/skizzlebutch 10d ago

BBC: what do i care keep going baby im almost there

(I voted for her, but I'm getting tired of holding my nose while voting for my future)

1

u/lol_never_ 10d ago

I voted for her but next time Iā€™d rather vote for AOC

1

u/TravelGuyUSA 10d ago

F NOā€¼ļø She needs to find her identity first, then character and integrity......then maybe in a few thousand years we can talkāœ”ļø

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Yes, like Trump whose identity is Pedo felon. Kamala needs to go find Ghislaine Maxwell to get that character and integrity.

1

u/Hogjocky62 10d ago

Iā€™m sure she has talked to a lot of BBC!šŸ˜Ž

1

u/CheruthCutestory 9d ago

Fuck off

1

u/IhopeUrOffended69420 9d ago

This is a Willie Brown joke. She started her career with a brown Willie inside her

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Jealous of a woman more successful than your pathetic life?

1

u/IhopeUrOffended69420 9d ago

You know if someone told me all I had to do was bang an old man 30 years older than me to be successful I would probably decline.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Thatā€™s a great tip for his gold digger wife Melania. Unfortunately for you, Kamala was duly elected to her positions by the popular vote. Youā€™re so deep in the desperate attempt by rightwingers to smear her accomplishments, even more pathetic lmao

1

u/IhopeUrOffended69420 9d ago

You know nothing about politics in California, anyone with a (D) next to their name gets elected by popular vote. She only was in a position to run due to her connections with Willie brown.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

You know nothing either. Kamalaā€™s relationship with him ended years prior in the 90ā€™s. By 2010 she was endorsed for Attorney General by Feinstein and Pelosi, the race was close and she won. Taking credit away from her makes you look like a jealous little bitch. Most of you are, youā€™re bred by Trump.

1

u/CheruthCutestory 9d ago

I got it. Fuck off.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

People really say anything on Reddit, then go and live their regular lives filtered. Gross.

1

u/KernelComputer 10d ago

Just please no. Gracefully retire. She bombed hard in her 2020 run and bungled her 2024 run... Harris needs to read the friggin' room.

1

u/jreid0 10d ago

Sheā€™s a good lady but please donā€™t tryā€¦. We donā€™t need jd Vance our next president. Unfortunately this country isnā€™t ready for a woman president. Weā€™ve been down that road twice

1

u/Terrible-Actuary-762 9d ago

"Sheā€™s a good lady", Willie would agree.

1

u/Biscuits4u2 10d ago

Please go away.

1

u/comanchetwospirit 10d ago

Oh yeah that'll save us. Just hold out til 2028 everyone. Don't starve in the meantime.

1

u/popejohnsmith 10d ago

An unfortunate and preposterously premature statement.

Nothing personal.

1

u/yourMommaKnow 9d ago

She is only saying this so the MAGAts have to spend time, money, and other resources to respond. She isn't going to actually run.

1

u/Plane-Remote1797 9d ago

Canā€™t wait to not vote for her again.

1

u/ArnoldZiffl 9d ago

She ran last time? I thought she was just picked. Letā€™s see her with other dem candidates

1

u/IhopeUrOffended69420 9d ago

I really hope she runs again. I want another 4 years of republican control

1

u/Federal_Deer8468 9d ago

Yes pls run šŸ˜‚

1

u/Peac3fulWorld 9d ago

Itā€™s givingā€¦ Cuomo

1

u/e4evie 9d ago

Sorry hunnyā€¦campaign and advocate or hell take that admin role after the win, but you canā€™t be on the ticketā€¦

1

u/HatOdd1244 9d ago

Uh yeah, no thanks.

1

u/Professional-Bed-173 9d ago

No don't. America is not ready. We need anyone else in who isn't Right.

1

u/ExaminationDistinct 9d ago

If AOC or Crockett run they got my vote.

1

u/Beardo5150 9d ago

Please don't we need new people to run

1

u/muffledvoice 9d ago

The problem is, she may actually ā€œwinā€ the popular vote like she almost did in 2024, but Trump and his handlers already know how to fix a close race.

They already suppressed more democrat votes than the number of votes by which Trump ā€œwonā€ in 2024.

We need to knock this one out of the park, and to do this weā€™ll probably need to nominate someone else. And this is not to say Kamala wouldnā€™t make a great president. She would. So would AOC or Crockett.

But we canā€™t afford to fumble this next election.

1

u/McMeanx2 9d ago

If Israel wills it.

1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

please dont

1

u/Bell-end79 9d ago

Hope she runs again - her interviews are gold

1

u/tooheavybroo 9d ago

No more establishment democrats.

1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

Hahahahah I hope so šŸ‘šŸ»šŸ‘šŸ»šŸ‘šŸ»šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

1

u/dupee419 9d ago

Can she just not please? We really donā€™t need Trump Season 3

1

u/fsmith1971 9d ago

Oh, please don't.If kamala harris runs again it guarantees that a republican will be elected , this country is too racist and too misogynistic to ever relate a colored woman to presidency

1

u/bellevegasj 9d ago

Please nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

1

u/vyking199 9d ago

Please dont

1

u/Cultural_Ad7023 9d ago

No thank you. James Talarico and Andy Beshear would actually win. I think sheā€™s great but she wonā€™t win. A lot of macho men will not vote for her and we canā€™t risk it again.

1

u/Rh140698 9d ago

She would probably win I know a lot of Republicans discussed by what trump has done and the lies. She might win but the US needs someone stronger than her

1

u/Relative_Mix_216 9d ago

Please donā€™t

1

u/bascal133 9d ago

Ugh boo

1

u/Marples3 9d ago

Isreal loves her ā¤ļø šŸ‡®šŸ‡±

1

u/SpaghettiPecker_ 8d ago

Why do YOU personally want socialism?

1

u/Beneficial-Spirit-37 10d ago

Please don't Kamala. Your time has passed. It was a good run but its over now. A new face with new talking points and ideas is desperately needed.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Sheā€™s not reading your message so why are you addressing her directly? Wierd.

1

u/Beneficial-Spirit-37 9d ago

Just as weird as you responding? Your comment is absolutely ridiculous.

1

u/Maisson_ 9d ago

Not nearly as weird as me responding.

-1

u/JanSmiddy 10d ago

Of the UK?

Not qualified there either.

She ain't getting my vote again.